Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Hayes

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Prosecutor
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1978-01-01 Legal case The Supreme Court case Bordenkircher v. Hayes was decided, which considered the propriety of a pr... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00021328.jpg

This document is a page from a legal brief (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, given the case number 1:20-cr-00330) discussing legal precedents involving prosecutorial discretion and immunity. It cites Supreme Court cases such as Wayte v. United States and Imbler v. Pachtman to argue that prosecutors have broad discretion in charging decisions and absolute immunity regarding those decisions, including the decision *not* to charge. The document concludes by introducing a section on plea agreement promises of leniency towards third parties, which is relevant to the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case.

Legal brief / court filing (appellate appendix)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021327.jpg

This legal document outlines the Department of Justice's policy regarding the deportation of criminal aliens, referencing a 1995 memorandum from the Attorney General that directs federal prosecutors to seek deportation unless extraordinary circumstances exist. It also discusses the legal concept of prosecutorial discretion, citing the 1978 Supreme Court case Bordenkircher v. Hayes, and provides legal definitions for terms like 'criminal alien' and offenses leading to deportation.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00003039.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, dated April 16, 2021, discussing legal precedents concerning the modification of protective orders in the face of a grand jury subpoena. It cites several Second Circuit cases, including Martindell and Davis, to argue that a grand jury's broad investigative powers often outweigh a party's reliance on a protective order, particularly for pre-existing documents. The text emphasizes that the need for a grand jury to gather evidence in a criminal investigation is a powerful reason to permit modification of such orders.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search