SUNDAY
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sharon Churcher
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annette Witheridge
|
Journalist employer |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-03-05 | N/A | Deadline for response to The Mail on Sunday (noon). | N/A | View |
EFTA00029616.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated March 13, 2020. It forwards a press inquiry from Mark Hookham of The Mail on Sunday, who is asking if US authorities (SDNY or FBI) have been informed about a new report filed with the Metropolitan Police in London regarding a sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein. The internal USANYS response indicates they intend to decline comment.
DOJ-OGR-00015226.tif
This document is a bibliography or publication list spanning from 1988 to 1990, primarily featuring works co-authored by E.F. Loftus on topics related to memory, eyewitness testimony, and psychological aspects of the legal system. It details numerous academic articles, book chapters, and reviews published in various journals and edited volumes, often in collaboration with a consistent set of co-authors. The publications explore themes such as memory distortions, the impact of context, misinformation, and the reliability of eyewitness accounts in legal settings.
DOJ-OGR-00023246.tif
This document details the process of informing victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Epstein case, including differing accounts of those communications. It highlights Villafaña's role in directing victim notifications and the USAO's confidentiality clause. News reports from October 2007 confirm Epstein's plea deal for state charges and the federal agreement to drop its probe, with victim Courtney Wild providing a contrasting recollection of the information she received.
DOJ-OGR-00021408.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal handling of victim notifications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes how prosecutor Villafaña directed agents to inform victims about the deal without disclosing the full text, citing confidentiality clauses and the belief that victims only needed to know about restitution rights. The text highlights a discrepancy between what agents claim they told victim Courtney Wild in October 2007 versus Wild's 2015 declaration stating she was misled about the federal case being dropped.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019810.jpg
This document appears to be page 322 from the notes section of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer). It contains endnotes for Chapter 18, citing various news articles and interviews regarding intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA), Russian espionage, and Edward Snowden. The document has a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production for a congressional committee. Despite the filename containing 'Epst', the content relates to the author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019803.jpg
This document is a page of endnotes (page 315) from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (ISBN 9780451494566), produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. The text provides citations for Chapters 11 and 12, detailing sources for events surrounding Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong, his time in the Moscow airport, and his interactions with Julian Assange and Sarah Harrison. It includes references to media articles from The Guardian, Newsweek, and Vanity Fair, and notes a $20,000 speaking fee paid to Snowden by the University of Arizona.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019674.jpg
This document is page 186 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (authored by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the file name 'Epst'), produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the intelligence fallout from Edward Snowden's 2013 data theft, including the compromise of British GCHQ operations and the inability of the U.S. to track Russian troop movements in Crimea. It discusses the transition from General Alexander to Admiral Michael Rogers at the NSA and the long-term damage assessment regarding U.S. electronic intelligence capabilities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019469.jpg
This document, labeled as a House Oversight exhibit, appears to be a news article detailing the connections between Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights Clinton's travels on Epstein's jet to Africa (with Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker) and Asia (Russia, China, Norway) in 2003, as well as allegations made by Virginia Roberts regarding Prince Andrew. The text notes that while Roberts met Clinton twice, she claims she was never trafficked to him, though she alleges Epstein once invited young women to a dinner for Clinton on his island.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019378.jpg
This document is a biographical article profiling Jeffrey Epstein (circa 2006), detailing his rise from a blue-collar background to immense wealth and high-society connections. It highlights his relationships with figures like Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexner, his acquisition of lavish properties in New York, Palm Beach, and New Mexico, and his donations to scientific research and political campaigns. The article also alludes to legal controversies, including a SEC probe, a Citibank loan default, and his association with Ponzi schemer Steven Hoffenberg.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018932.jpg
This document is a newspaper profile (likely circa 2006) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's rise from a blue-collar background to a wealthy financier. It highlights his mysterious nature, his high-profile connections including Bill Clinton and Leslie Wexner, his lavish properties, and his legal issues, including a past SEC probe and a Citibank lawsuit. The article also notes his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and his financial support of scientists and Democratic politicians.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022047.jpg
This document is a scan of pages 240 and the subsequent page from a book by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text contrasts the massive media coverage of Prince Andrew's scandals (specifically regarding a 'gun smuggler') against the backdrop of the 2011 Japan earthquake. The second page begins a section on Alan Dershowitz, detailing a legal motion filed in early 2008 by a lawyer named Brad (likely Brad Edwards) on behalf of two unnamed women, accusing Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's trafficking activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012112.jpg
This document is page 6 of a telephone interview transcript between Virginia Roberts and an interviewer (JS) regarding the case Edwards adv. Epstein. Virginia details her transition from working at Mar-a-Lago to working for Epstein full-time, identifies her father as Sky William Roberts (a former Mar-a-Lago maintenance supervisor), and discusses media reports involving Prince Andrew. She concludes by explaining her motivation for cooperating is to seek justice for herself and other victims and to prevent the procurement of young girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026977.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of an Eventbrite page for an event featuring author Michael Wolff and journalist Matthew d'Ancona. It includes biographical information for both men and promotional quotes for Wolff's books about the Trump White House. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017409.jpg
A page from a document submitted to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017409), appearing to be an excerpt from an autobiography or legal filing by Alan Dershowitz. The text describes his time as a professor at Harvard Law School in the late 1960s, specifically focusing on a popular course he created regarding the legal aspects of the Vietnam War. It highlights his philosophy on civil liberties and mentions media coverage from Time Magazine and the New York Times.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023068.jpg
This document appears to be the end of an email chain containing a request for comment from Sharon Churcher of The Mail on Sunday (New York office). The email sets a deadline for the following Saturday. The document includes two distinct confidentiality disclaimers: one for Associated Newspapers Ltd. and a second specific disclaimer stating the communication is the property of Jeffrey Epstein, which directs error notifications to the email address jeevacation@gmail.com. The document is stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023068.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, detailing the reaction to an upcoming story in 'The Mail on Sunday' involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The chain originates with a journalist's inquiry to Brett Jaffe, which is forwarded through Mark Cohen to Ghislaine Maxwell, who then forwards it to Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein subsequently forwards the chain to Alan Dershowitz, with their direct correspondence redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023059.jpg
An email chain dating from March 4, 2011, initiated by a media inquiry from Annette Witheridge of The Mail on Sunday regarding an upcoming story involving allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The inquiry details specific sexual allegations involving a 15-year-old girl at Epstein's Palm Beach house. This inquiry was forwarded from lawyer Mark Cohen to Maxwell, then from Maxwell to Epstein, and finally from Epstein to Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.jpg
This email chain from March 4, 2011, tracks a reaction to an upcoming 'Mail on Sunday' story involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Prince Andrew ('The Duke'). The chain begins with a journalist contacting lawyer Brett Jaffe, which is forwarded through Mark Cohen to Maxwell, then to Epstein, and finally to The Duke. Epstein dismisses the allegations as 'salcisous' (salacious) and jokes to The Duke that the only person Maxwell hasn't slept with is Elvis, while The Duke expresses confusion and asks how Epstein plans to respond.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023051.jpg
This document is an email chain originating in March 2011 and forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein to Darren Indyke in April 2019. The original 2011 correspondence involves a journalist from The Mail on Sunday, Annette Witheridge, contacting Brett Jaffe regarding an upcoming story about Maxwell, Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The chain shows the legal coordination between Mark Cohen, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein to ignore the press inquiry, as well as a privileged communication sent to Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023039.jpg
This document is a letter from Annette Witheridge of the Mail on Sunday to Brett Jaffe, requesting urgent responses to a series of allegations regarding Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The 14 specific points detail allegations of sexual abuse, trafficking, and interactions with high-profile figures such as Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and Ehud Barak, often involving a redacted victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, initiated by a media inquiry from the Mail on Sunday regarding an upcoming story about Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The inquiry was forwarded up a chain: from Brett Jaffe to Mark Cohen, to Ghislaine Maxwell, to Jeffrey Epstein, and finally to 'The Duke' (Prince Andrew). The Duke replies to Epstein expressing confusion ('I don't know any of this') and asking how Epstein intends to respond.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 2011, forwarding a media inquiry from Annette Witheridge of the Mail on Sunday to attorney Brett Jaffe. The inquiry details specific sexual allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein involving minors and lists several high-profile individuals alleged to have been involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023029.jpg
This document is an email fragment containing a press inquiry from Sharon Churcher of The Mail on Sunday to Jeffrey Epstein (or his representatives). Churcher requests comment on allegations that Epstein flew two young women to a dinner to entertain President Clinton and that an unnamed woman was sex trafficked to men listed in Epstein's address book. The document includes email footers for both Associated Newspapers Ltd. and Jeffrey Epstein, the latter revealing the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.jpg
This document is a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Fred Haddad, Tonja Haddad Coleman) regarding a media inquiry from Sharon Churcher of The Mail on Sunday. The journalist is requesting comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards, specifically regarding a witness who intends to testify that Epstein flew her to London to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 for $15,000. The internal responses between Epstein and his lawyers are redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023027.jpg
This document is an email inquiry from journalist Sharon Churcher of The Mail on Sunday (NY Office) requesting a comment regarding allegations that a woman 'entertained' President Clinton and was sex trafficked to men listed in Jeffrey Epstein's address book. The email sets a deadline for the following Saturday at 1pm ET and includes standard legal disclaimers and company registration information for Associated Newspapers Ltd. The document is stamped as part of House Oversight records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity