| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense team
|
Expert witness counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional witness party |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Edge
|
Board member |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trial testimony | Professor Elizabeth Loftus, a memory expert for the defense, testified about experiments on impla... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Elizabeth Loftus regarding false memory experiments. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding / witness testimony | Direct examination of Elizabeth Loftus, a professor and scientist, who was called as a witness by... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony / direct examination | Elizabeth Loftus is called as a witness by the Defendant and begins her direct examination, stati... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Elizabeth Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxw... | Courtroom | View |
This document is a printed email from November 22, 2021, questioning the inclusion of Elizabeth Loftus in an unspecified group or event ('the table'). The sender argues against her inclusion based on her alleged knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein and her position on the board of the EDGE Foundation, providing a link to her bio on the EDGE website.
This document is a legal exhibit containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent featuring an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury found the victims credible despite defense attempts to attack them and use memory expert Elizabeth Loftus to cast doubt on their recollections. He highlights a specific moment where a victim named 'Carolyn' became distressed on the stand, noting that such incidents increased his compassion rather than creating doubt.
This document is a partial court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a segment of a legal proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It records the beginning of the direct examination of Elizabeth Loftus, a professor and scientist, who was called as a witness by the defense. The transcript includes exchanges between Ms. Sternheim (defense counsel), Mr. Everdell, and the presiding Judge, as Professor Loftus starts to explain her role to the jury.
This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of Elizabeth Loftus's direct examination. Ms. Loftus, identified as a professor and scientist, is called as a witness by the Defendant. The excerpt includes procedural discussions between Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Everdell, and THE COURT regarding the handling of an exhibit and the commencement of the witness's testimony.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, the judge confirms the jury's deliberation schedule, which includes holidays, and reads a note from the jury requesting the transcripts of expert witness Elizabeth Loftus. Counsel then raises an issue regarding the transcript of Cimberly Espinosa.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity