This document is a letter dated March 20, 2020, from attorney Joshua I. Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. It requests oral argument regarding the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in the case of Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York law and doctrines of equitable estoppel/tolling, contrary to the Defendants' assertions.
This document is a 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on March 9, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case Teresa Helm v. Indyke, et al. (Case No. 19-cv-10476-PGG). Attorney Sabina Mariella notifies the court and parties that she has moved from the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and will continue as counsel of record on the case.
A Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP enters his appearance as counsel for Plaintiff Teresa Helm in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
This document is a civil summons issued on November 13, 2019, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). The summons notifies the defendants that a lawsuit has been filed against them and instructs them to respond within 21 days. The second page contains a blank Proof of Service form.
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 11, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Teresa Helm against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defendants named are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' under Torts, and the plaintiff demands a jury trial.
A 'Notice of Appearance' filed on March 6, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sabina Mariella of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP officially enters her appearance as counsel for the plaintiff, Maria Farmer, in her lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for Case No. 1:19-cv-10474. Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the Plaintiff, Maria Farmer. The lawsuit is directed against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10474-NRB). Plaintiff Maria Farmer is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days of service, with Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP listed as the plaintiff's attorney.
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit initiated by Maria Farmer against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The nature of the suit is categorized as 'Other Personal Injury' under diversity jurisdiction, as the plaintiff resides in Arkansas and the defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands (Epstein's domicile). The plaintiff demands a jury trial.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-10577). Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is entering his appearance as counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
This document is a civil summons issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 18, 2019. The plaintiff, Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The defendants are directed to respond to the complaint through their attorney, Bennet J. Moskowitz, or the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller.
This document is a Notice of Change of Address filed on March 9, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for Case No. 19-cv-10479-ALC (Juliette Bryant v. Indyke, et al.). Attorney Sabina Mariella notifies the court that she is changing firms from Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and will continue as counsel of record on the case.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sabina Mariella of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters her appearance as counsel for the plaintiff, Juliette Bryant, in her lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 6, 2020. Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the plaintiff, Juliette Bryant, in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
This document is a civil summons filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-10479. Plaintiff Juliette Bryant is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The defendants are instructed to respond within 21 days to plaintiff's attorney Joshua Schiller.
Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Juliette Bryant, a resident of South Africa, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' tort, with jurisdiction based on diversity (foreign citizen vs citizens of another state/USVI).
An email chain from December 2019 involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink, Troutman Sanders, and Boies Schiller Flexner regarding The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence involves the forwarding of attached letters between counsel, with Roberta Kaplan forwarding the thread to an undisclosed recipient noting, 'I assume you have this.' The thread indicates ongoing legal coordination or dispute resolution concerning the Epstein Estate.
A letter dated October 15, 2019, from Matthew L. Schwartz of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to an Assistant US Attorney. Schwartz informs the government that his client intends to purchase a Sikorsky S-76C helicopter for $3.5 million from Hyperion Air, LLC, a USVI entity associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The letter notes that Darren K. Indyke represents the seller and seeks confirmation that the government does not intend to block the sale or seize the asset.
This legal document is a letter dated June 14, 2022, from MARSH law firm pllc to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The firm, representing sex trafficking victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, formally requests that the two women be allowed to speak at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The request is supported by a citation from the Crime Victims' Rights Act, asserting their right to be heard.
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial because a juror, identified as Juror 50, failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection. This omission prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge, and the juror later revealed his bias to the media by stating his memory was 'like a video' and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility. The argument cites numerous New Jersey court precedents where judgments were invalidated for similar juror inaccuracies.
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial due to material omissions by a juror, identified as Juror 50. The juror failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection, which prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge and would have been grounds for dismissal for cause. The argument is bolstered by citing the juror's later statements to the media, where he claimed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility, revealing a bias that tainted the trial.
This document appears to be a page from a report or article submitted to the House Oversight Committee, focusing on the economics of the medical supply chain and hospital billing practices. It uses a case study of a 2012 food poisoning outbreak at a Buddhist monastery in Carmel, N.Y., to illustrate how medical supply distributors (like Cardinal Health) operate and how patients face opaque billing structures, such as a grandmother and toddler billed $1,400 despite having Medicaid coverage. The text highlights the role of group-purchasing organizations and the impact of the Affordable Care Act on hospital consolidations.
This document is page A19 of 46 from an OGE Form 278e financial disclosure filed by Donald J. Trump. It details the ownership structure of several Trump properties, primarily golf clubs in Charlotte, Hudson Valley, Jupiter, and Philadelphia, as well as entities related to properties in Toronto and New York (106 CPS and 845 UN). The document establishes DJT Holdings LLC and The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust as the primary holding vehicles for these assets. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to Congress.
This document is page A9 of 46 from Donald J. Trump's OGE Form 278e financial disclosure. It details the ownership structures and holding percentages for various business entities, including 'Flights Inc,' 'Helicopter Air Services Inc,' and 'Golf Recreation Scotland Limited.' The document carries a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016749,' indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity