CSO
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sender (Redacted)
|
Professional security |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Proposed Evidence Inspection | 500 Pearl Street, Proffer R... | View |
| 2021-10-26 | N/A | Proposed Evidence Inspection Meeting | Proffer room (Redacted loca... | View |
| 2021-09-25 | N/A | Jury exercise / Trial preparation meeting | Undisclosed Site (departing... | View |
EFTA00025141.pdf
This document is an email dated October 26, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email requests the scheduling of an evidence inspection for that week, asking the recipients (likely liaisons to the US Marshals) to produce the defendant (Maxwell) to a proffer room. The email notes that defense attorneys are flying in from out of state for this meeting and that a CSO and case agent will be present.
EFTA00018006.pdf
An email chain dated September 24, 2021, detailing the logistical and document preparation for a legal proceeding or mock jury exercise related to Ghislaine Maxwell (indicated by attachment 'GM_jury_exercise'). The correspondence is likely among the prosecution team (referencing 'govt slides' and '1SA' - SDNY HQ), coordinating the printing of jury instructions, opening/closing slides, and arranging transport via a Court Security Officer (CSO) for the following morning.
DOJ-OGR-00017280.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during jury deliberations. The jury sent notes requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition (3505-005) related to Carolyn. Counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) discuss preparing these documents with necessary redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00014710.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge, Prosecutor Ms. Moe, and Defense Attorney Mr. Everdell are discussing a response to a note received from the jury. The Judge decides to refer the jury back to Instruction Number 21 on page 28. Additionally, the parties discuss extending the schedule for jury deliberations for the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00014691.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts a discussion between the Judge (The Court), Defense (Mr. Everdell), and Prosecution (Ms. Moe) regarding a response to a jury note during deliberations. The court is preparing to send the jury a transcript of testimony from a witness named 'Matt' and is clarifying jury instructions regarding the definition of 'enticement' found on pages 21 and 33 of the charge.
DOJ-OGR-00014660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge and counsel while the jury is not present. The conversation centers on two notes from the jury requesting testimony transcripts for individuals named Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition of Carolyn. The counsel confirms they are finalizing redactions before sending the documents to the jury via court staff.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity