| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Meeting with Judge Pitman to unseal and wheel case | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Epstein unsealing | Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Submission of Government bail memorandum | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Submission of detention memo for Jeffrey Epstein (JE) to Judges Berman and Pitman | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Initial Appearance and Arraignment Conference. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Arraignment and presentment before Magistrate Judge Pitman (earlier in the day). | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings cover the scheduling of bail hearings, the government's confirmation of its obligation to notify victims, and preliminary arguments regarding the 2007/2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues the NPA bars this prosecution, while the government asserts the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York and that the current indictment involves separate conduct and victims.
This document is an email chain from July 8, 2019, concerning the government's bail memorandum in the case U.S. v. Epstein (19 Cr. 490). An Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York submits the detention memo to Judge Pitman's chambers and defense counsel (including Marc Fernich, Martin Weinberg, and Reid Weingarten) ahead of the arraignment and bail argument. Marc Fernich acknowledges receipt of the document.
This document is an email thread from July 8-9, 2019, between defense attorney Marc Fernich and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the case U.S. v. Epstein. The correspondence covers the filing of the government's bail memorandum to Judge Pitman and Judge Berman. Additionally, Fernich requests the return of Jeffrey Epstein's personal effects (phone and cash) seized upon arrest, leading to coordination with a Special Agent.
This document is an email chain from July 7-8, 2019, regarding the legal presentment and unsealing of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 Cr. 490). The correspondence discusses scheduling a meeting with Judge Pitman to 'unseal and wheel' the case and confirms Epstein's representation by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten. The emails coordinate the timing for the unsealing order and the formal call-in of the case.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses regarding an 'Additional warrant app.' Judge Moses sets a deadline of 11:00 PM for review that night, suggesting Judge Pitman as an alternative for the next day. The AUSA responds shortly after (approx 9:28 PM EST based on the UTC timestamp) attaching a search warrant application titled '2019.07.07_Media_SW.pdf' and noting that the affiant (a Special Agent) is available.
An email dated July 8, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the submission of a detention memo for 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein). The sender discusses proofing the draft and submitting it to Judge Berman, Judge Pitman, and defense counsel at 10:30. This corresponds to the timeframe immediately following Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
This document contains a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and SDNY prosecutors in July 2019, shortly after Epstein's arrest. The correspondence primarily concerns the return of personal effects (cash, clothes) and the retention of electronic devices (phones, computers) seized during the arrest, with the government confirming they obtained a warrant to search the electronics. Significant discussion focuses on the protocol for reviewing these devices ('taint team') to protect attorney-client privilege and clarification regarding the recusal of the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and the involvement of the Northern District of Georgia.
An email dated July 7, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to redacted recipients. The sender is urgently seeking contact information for Judge Pitman's deputy to arrange the 'Epstein unsealing' for the following morning, noting that 'far more important people' want the contact made immediately on the weekend.
This document is an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) shortly after Epstein's July 2019 arrest. The defense requests the return of items seized from Epstein's person upon arrest, specifically cash and his cellphone. The government agrees to return the cash and personal effects at an upcoming Thursday hearing but refuses to return the electronic devices, stating they have obtained a warrant to search them and will retain them as evidence. Weinberg also mentions providing a list of attorneys for a 'taint prosecutor,' implying a privilege review process.
This document contains a chain of emails from July 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Marc Fernich, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence primarily concerns the coordination of returning personal items (cash, effects) seized from Epstein during his arrest, while the government explicitly states they are retaining his electronic devices pursuant to a search warrant. The emails also reference the submission of a government bail memorandum to Judges Pitman and Berman.
This document is page 3 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Epstein). The Judge questions prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller to ensure victims have been notified of the case. The discussion also covers Epstein's status as a Tier 3 sex offender in New York, originating from his 2008 Florida prosecution, classifying him as a high-risk individual for committing sex crimes with minors.
Submission setting forth details about the case, copied to the current Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity