| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Indykes
|
Co defendants |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-15 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to reply | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Defendants Indykes and Kahn filed a Motion to Dismiss | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
This document is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the derivative litigation against JP Morgan Chase & Co. It outlines arguments regarding pleading standards, demand futility, and failure to state claims against the defendants, including specific points related to JPMorgan's termination of Epstein as a client and the oversight of internal controls by the board of directors. The document includes a table of authorities citing numerous legal cases.
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated May 9, 2020, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell vs. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Judge Michael C. Dunston orders the plaintiff to respond to a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Indykes and Kahn by June 1, 2020, with a subsequent reply deadline for the defendants set for June 15, 2020.
A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity