| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0013-08-28 | N/A | The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor. | United States | View |
This document provides detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's 2013 rulings in United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry regarding same-sex marriage and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). It explains the tax implications of striking down DOMA, specifically concerning the federal estate tax marital deduction, and summarizes Justice Kennedy's majority opinion that DOMA was unconstitutional because it violated equal protection and due process principles.
This document is the 2013 table of contents for a 'Tax Topics' publication series from Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, featuring articles by Blanche Lark Christerson. It lists various tax-related subjects published throughout the year, including legal cases like United States v. Windsor and updates on tax law. The document's content is about general U.S. tax matters and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or his known associates, though the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022330' suggests it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
This document is page 3 of a 'Tax Topics' briefing dated December 20, 2013, which analyzes recent changes in U.S. tax law. It details the new 3.8% net investment income tax under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the implications of the Supreme Court's Windsor decision on same-sex marriage for federal taxes, and the troubled rollout of HealthCare.gov. The document is a general overview of tax law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or associated individuals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity