Trove
Sign In Sign Up

11th Circuit

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00031397.pdf

This document is an internal DOJ email chain from October 30, 2019, coordinating a response to an urgent request from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). ODAG required statistics regarding victim attendance and notification at the August 27, 2019, Epstein hearing to respond to a mandamus petition filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). USANYS officials discussed the number of victims present (17 present, 7 statements read by others) and the statements made by attorney Brad Edwards regarding clients who could not attend.

Email chain / internal department of justice correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00017905.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 30, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns an appeal filed in the 11th Circuit regarding the Epstein CVRA case, specifically addressing allegations that victims were unable to attend the SDNY hearing due to insufficient notice. The emails detail that 39 victim notices were sent via VNS, 17 victims attended the hearing personally, and 7 had statements read in their absence; one specific anecdote describes a victim who missed two arranged flights and failed to attend.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017363.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the arguments and the specific testimony quoted) labeled with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text recounts the author's testimony before Congress defending President Clinton against impeachment by arguing there is a hierarchy of perjury, distinguishing Clinton's 'marginal' lies from more dangerous police perjury ('testilying'). The author also describes a disagreement with Chief Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat regarding the nature of perjury.

Manuscript draft / house oversight production
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search