This document analyzes the complexities of a potential conflict between the U.S. and Iran, suggesting that such a war would likely escalate beyond initial military strikes into a prolonged struggle across diplomatic, economic, and social domains. It warns that Iran could broaden the conflict through asymmetric means like terrorism, requiring the U.S. to plan for a multi-faceted war rather than a limited military engagement.
This document appears to be page 22 of a strategic policy report or academic paper (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018106) analyzing potential U.S. military objectives regarding Iran's nuclear program. It outlines three specific strategic options: a limited strike to delay the program (the 'Peenemünde option'), a broader campaign to force submission, and a full campaign for regime change. It discusses the economic implications (oil prices, stock values) and the military requirements (stealth systems, air power) for these scenarios.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity