| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-09 | N/A | Notice of Change of Address filed by attorney Mary Dirago due to firm name change. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-20 | N/A | Attorney Mary S. DiRago signed a Notice of Change of Address. | Chicago, IL | View |
| 2020-02-14 | N/A | Filing of Affidavit in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Mary DiRago. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-02-13 | N/A | Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Mary S. DiRago. | United States District Cour... | View |
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated February 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman granted a motion for Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP to be admitted Pro Hac Vice as counsel for the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Epstein's estate).
This document is a 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on March 23, 2020, in the US District Court SDNY case 'Maria Farmer vs. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn' (executors of the Epstein Estate). Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP notifies the court that her firm's address in Chicago has moved from One North Wacker Drive to 227 W. Monroe Street. She confirms she remains counsel of record.
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated February 24, 2020, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate). The order grants attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to represent the defendants.
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated August 26, 2021, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Indyke and Kahn. The order grants a motion for attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP to appear pro hac vice as counsel for the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. It is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
A court document filed on July 8, 2020, in the Southern District of New York for Case No. 19-CV-11869-MKV-DCF (Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et al.). Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. Dirago filed a Notice of Change of Address to reflect a change in her firm's name from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, while retaining the same Chicago address.
This document is an Affidavit filed on February 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP submits this sworn statement to support her motion for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn) in a civil suit brought by Anastasia Doe. The affidavit confirms her good standing with the Illinois Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
A 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on July 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. Dirago notifies the court that her firm name has changed from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, while her physical address in Chicago remains the same.
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 14, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, in the case brought by Jane Doe 1000. The filing includes an affidavit from DiRago and certificates of good standing from the Illinois Bar.
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the case of Teala Davies v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Epstein's estate), in the Southern District of New York. The attorney attests to her good standing in Illinois and lack of disciplinary history.
This document is an affidavit filed on February 13, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York by attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago. She is requesting admission Pro Hac Vice to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate) in the case brought by plaintiff Teala Davies. The affidavit certifies her good standing with the Illinois Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
This document is a Notice of Change of Address filed on July 9, 2020, in the case of Juliette Bryant v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. Dirago notifies the court that her firm, formerly Troutman Sanders LLP, is now Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP. Her physical address in Chicago remains unchanged.
A Notice of Change of Address filed on March 23, 2020, in the SDNY case Juliette Bryant v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP notifies the court that her firm has moved from One North Wacker Drive to 227 W. Monroe Street in Chicago, IL. She confirms she will continue as counsel of record.
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the Estate's executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The filing includes her affidavit and certificates of good standing from the Illinois Bar and the Northern District of Illinois.
Formal declaration supporting motion to practice law in this specific case jurisdiction.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity