State Attorney
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00015140.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted criminal history record (rap sheet) generated on October 6, 2021, by the NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services for the FBI. It pertains to a single-source offender (likely Epstein or an associate) and contains Florida-specific information, including references to expunged and sealed records. A visible disposition indicates a misdemeanor conviction on January 18, 2012, and the index lists multiple law enforcement agencies in Palm Beach and Volusia County, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00030469.jpg
A legal letter dated June 22, 2006, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense firm (Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss) to State Attorney Barry Krischer. The defense argues that based on recent meetings and polygraph results from expert George Slattery, there are no allegations of actual sex and the accuser claimed to be 18. The letter requests that no charges be filed or an informal agreement be reached, while simultaneously attacking the accuser's credibility by citing her online behavior and alleged changing of her age.
DOJ-OGR-00021416.jpg
This document, a legal filing, details disputes and communications from 2007 concerning victim notification and compensation in a federal case related to Epstein. It highlights arguments between legal figures like Lefkowitz, Starr, Acosta, and Villafaña regarding the interpretation of victim rights laws and the handling of specific victims, including 'Jane Doe #2' whose attorney was paid by Epstein. The text reveals concerns about the government's adherence to victim notification requirements and allegations of misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00021375.jpg
This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report criticizing former U.S. Attorney Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The report concludes that Acosta's decision to resolve the case with a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) before the investigation was complete was 'poor judgment' and prevented the USAO from obtaining significant evidence, such as surveillance footage from the PBPD and cooperation from potential co-conspirators. The document notes that key investigative steps, like interviewing Epstein's assistants, were not taken before the lenient deal was offered.
DOJ-OGR-00021374.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report analyzing U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It criticizes the reliance on state procedures for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), noting that the specific state charges selected allowed Epstein to avoid sex offender registration in New Mexico due to age-of-consent laws. It also details that Acosta was aware the Palm Beach Police Department distrusted the State Attorney's Office, yet he proceeded with a plea deal that relied heavily on state authorities.
DOJ-OGR-00021204.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a DOJ report (likely the OPR report) detailing the structure of Florida law enforcement and the background of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. It outlines the roles of the Palm Beach State Attorney and Sheriff's Office, Acosta's professional history, and his direct involvement in negotiating Jeffrey Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent state plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00031538.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to share copies of exhibits after a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm a prior agreement that Goldberger will provide copies of all exhibits to him and the State Attorney, highlighting a potential conflict or lack of cooperation among the legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00002969.jpg
This document is page 35 of a court filing (Document 204) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was strictly limited to the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and did not provide national immunity for co-conspirators. It contends that the defendant's interpretation—that Epstein secured broader immunity for co-conspirators than himself—is counterintuitive and unsupported by the text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019374.jpg
A newspaper article profiling Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter amidst his conflict with State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Reiter is described by colleagues as a man of high integrity and professionalism who pushed for Epstein to face serious charges and referred the case to the FBI due to perceived mishandling by the State Attorney. The article also details Reiter's history with the department, including high-profile investigations involving the Kennedy family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019221.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated May 27, 2008, from Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, supplementing a request for an independent review of the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter argues that the prosecution is an unprecedented extension of federal law against a figure with 'close ties to former President Clinton' and complains that Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman imposed an arbitrary June 2 deadline to force compliance with a Non-Prosecution Agreement, thereby attempting to bypass the requested review. The lawyers also allege misconduct, including leaks to the New York Times and conflicts of interest involving Sloman's former law partner filing civil suits against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013471.jpg
This legal document outlines the justification for deposing Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clinton in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein. The text details evidence linking both men to Epstein, including flight logs showing extensive travel on Epstein's plane (2002-2005), testimony from housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez regarding Dershowitz's presence at Epstein's home during abuse, and allegations of Clinton's close relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell. It also references a Vicky Ward Vanity Fair article and a $30 million donation to Harvard.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013416.jpg
A Palm Beach Post article from September 18, 2009, reporting on the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. The deal, criticized by legal experts and victims' attorneys as a "sweetheart deal," protected potential co-conspirators from charges and initially included a provision for Epstein to pay for a lawyer to negotiate civil settlements with victims. The article highlights the lack of consultation with victims and the disparity in sentencing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013366.jpg
This legal document outlines the justification for deposing Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clinton in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein. Paragraph 14 details Dershowitz's close friendship with Epstein, his presence at Epstein's home during alleged abuse, and his role in preventing felony charges. Paragraph 15 details Clinton's relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, allegations of an affair, and extensive travel on Epstein's plane (over 10 times) between 2002 and 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025704.jpg
In this confidential letter dated May 27, 2008, attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley urge Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip to intervene in the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. They allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, specifically Jeffrey Sloman, imposed an arbitrary deadline for a Non-Prosecution Agreement to prevent an independent DOJ review. The letter highlights Epstein's 'close ties' to former President Clinton and alleges misconduct by the USAO, including leaks to the New York Times and conflicts of interest involving Sloman's former law partner.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021801.jpg
This document appears to be a profile or news article detailing the career of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, specifically focusing on his conflict with State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Epstein investigation. It highlights Reiter's letter urging Krischer to recuse himself, his subsequent referral of the Epstein case to the FBI, and provides biographical details of his career, including high-profile investigations involving the Kennedy family. The text establishes Reiter's reputation for professionalism and integrity among his peers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021770.jpg
This document contains an excerpt from a Palm Beach Post article dated August 14, 2006, discussing the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and the conflict between his defense team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It details allegations against Epstein involving minors, his lawyers' attempts to discredit Reiter by calling him a "nutcase" and bringing up his divorce, and Reiter's criticism of State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012144.jpg
This document is a legal submission from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that the Florida State Attorney's Office has already investigated and charged Epstein as a 'local John' for soliciting prostitution, and that under the DOJ's 'Petite Policy,' federal prosecution is precluded following state action. The defense minimizes the allegations, asserting the women were over 16, acted voluntarily, and were not 'trolled' at high schools.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity