| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Greer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pate
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | CL brought to Epstein's house by Miller, dinner served, coerced into massage and sexual acts. | Epstein's House, El Brillo Way | View |
| N/A | Sexual assault/exploitation | CL was brought to Epstein's house by Miller, had dinner, then was coerced into providing a massag... | Epstein's house on El Brill... | View |
| N/A | Trip | CL was taken to Epstein's house by Miller, had dinner, and was then led upstairs for what she was... | Jeffrey Epstein's house on ... | View |
| 2019-08-05 | N/A | Intensive legal visits for Jeffrey Epstein. | MCC New York | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Legal case | Citation of United States v. Miller, 911 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2018). | 1st Cir. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Legal proceeding | The First Circuit considered the issue of Section 3283's retroactivity in *United States v. Mille... | N/A | View |
| 2004-05-01 | N/A | Victim (age 15-16) taken to Epstein's house, told she would model lingerie. Instead, instructed t... | Jeffrey Epstein's house, Pa... | View |
| 1976-01-01 | Legal case | The case of United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 443 was decided, establishing precedent for th... | N/A | View |
| 1967-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case citation for Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 (1967). | N/A | View |
| 0018-06-10 | N/A | Planned focus on 'Miller' mentioned in messages from previous day. | Unspecified | View |
This document appears to be a page (117) from a book manuscript or legal draft, likely authored by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the 'House Oversight' Bates stamp collection. The text argues against the censorship of pornography, critiquing a definition proposed by 'radical feminists' as too vague and potentially encompassing classic literature. The author posits that political censorship and the suppression of state secrets pose a greater threat to democracy than obscenity.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity