Mr. Buscemi
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Endorsement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00019138.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural debate between legal counsel and a judge. An unnamed attorney objects to Ms. Moe's proposal to have a witness, Mr. Buscemi, present exhibits to the jury, arguing it prevents substantive cross-examination and resembles a closing argument. Ms. Moe defends the method as a streamlined process to show the jury evidence they haven't yet seen.
DOJ-OGR-00019130.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures a legal debate regarding witness testimony: first, confirming a female witness will testify only to facts and not offer opinions on 'grooming' (Rule 702), and second, a defense objection by Mr. Pagliuca regarding the government's use of Mr. Buscemi as a 'summary witness' under Rule 1006. The defense argues Buscemi should not analyze complex business or phone records.
DOJ-OGR-00013555.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural argument between legal counsel and the judge. The discussion centers on the appropriate method for presenting exhibits to a jury, specifically concerning a witness, Mr. Buscemi, whose testimony would be limited to simply identifying the items. An attorney, Ms. Moe, defends her proposed streamlined approach against objections that it is improper and prevents substantive cross-examination.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity