This letter, dated January 18, 2008, is from attorney Jeffrey Herman of the law firm Herman & Mermelstein PA to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. Herman formally notifies the State Attorney's Office that his firm has been retained to represent a client and his minor daughter in their legal claim against Jeffrey Epstein.
This letter, dated January 10, 2008, is from the FBI's West Palm Beach office to an individual identified as a crime victim. It serves to officially notify the victim that a case is under investigation, outlines their specific rights under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 3771), and provides information on how to use the Victim Notification System (VNS) for case updates.
This is a fax cover sheet dated May 5, 2005, from A. Grant at the Office of the State Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. The fax is addressed to the Subpoena Compliance department of T-Mobile and indicates that four pages are attached.
This document is a letter dated August 2, 2005, from T-Mobile USA's Law Enforcement Relations department to Detective Michelle Pagan of the Palm Beach Police Department. It serves as a response to a subpoena, providing detailed account information for a specific T-Mobile subscriber, including their date of birth, address, and account start date. The letter confirms that Call Detail Records are also being provided as requested.
Attorney Stuart S. Mermelstein of Herman & Mermelstein PA sends a letter via facsimile to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office regarding the case State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein. Mermelstein requests coordination for client depositions, arguing for a single deposition per client to be used in both the civil and criminal cases to protect the victims' emotional well-being. He notes that a deposition is scheduled for April 2, 2008, and urges a prompt response.
This is a letter dated February 5, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold of the Ricci~Leopold law firm to Judge Sandra K. McSorley. The letter serves as a cover for the enclosed 'Motion For Protective Order' filed on behalf of 'Jane Doe' in the criminal case of State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2006 CF 009454 A). Leopold requests ten minutes of the court's time to present the motion.
Attorney Jeffrey Herman writes to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek of the State Attorney's Office on February 5, 2008, regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Herman states that a subpoena for a deposition scheduled for the next day was improperly served, the intended deponent is unaware of it and will not appear. He also notes that as counsel for a party in a related civil claim, he was not notified by Epstein's counsel, Jack Goldberger, and requests to be included in future scheduling.
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to share copies of exhibits after a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm a prior agreement that Goldberger will provide copies of all exhibits to him and the State Attorney, highlighting a potential conflict or lack of cooperation among the legal team.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about their contact with Steven Lavelle, stating they no longer speak. The witness denies knowing two redacted female individuals by name but suggests they could identify them from photos, and also denies any knowledge of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about her awareness of being sought and an incident where she switched name tags with a friend at her workplace, Quarterdeck, to avoid them. The witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects strongly to a question he deems harassment, highlighting a contentious legal exchange.
This document is a transcript from a 2017 deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they had contact with Epstein but denies any prior communication via email, text, or chat before meeting him. The witness states they visited Epstein's house only once, approximately three years prior, and never told him they were under 18.
This document is page 145 of an index from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'lawyer' to 'lying' with corresponding page and line numbers from the transcript. It references individuals named Leopold, Lewis, and Licata, and locations including Loxahatchee.
This document is page 124 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated and adversarial exchange between several individuals, identified as Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Tein, regarding the proper procedure for copying and marking photo exhibits. The conversation is marked by frequent interruptions, personal insults, and appeals to a third party, highlighting significant conflict between the participants.
This document is page 110 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about serious allegations, including whether a firefighter named Brett is in a relationship with a minor and whether the witness has lied about their sister's alleged drug habit. The witness denies the accusations while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as argumentative.
This article details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines the evidence gathered by Palm Beach police, including witness statements, surveillance, and a raid on Epstein's mansion that yielded photos and hidden cameras. The text also describes the aggressive defense strategy employed by Epstein's legal team, including private investigators and lawyers Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz, to undermine the credibility of the victims and witnesses.
An FBI FD-350 form archiving an August 5, 2006, Palm Beach Post article titled 'Expert: Ignorance of age isn't defense in sex cases.' The article quotes legal expert Bob Dekle stating that not knowing a victim's age is not a valid defense for sex crimes. It details that Palm Beach police found probable cause to charge Epstein with sex acts involving five underage girls and notes that NY politician Eliot Spitzer returned $50,000 in donations from Epstein.
This newspaper article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding a failed plea deal and a subsequent polygraph test where Epstein allegedly passed regarding knowledge of the girls' ages. It highlights allegations of witness intimidation, police reports of harassment by private investigators, and the involvement of high-profile attorneys. The article also mentions Epstein's connections to powerful figures like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, and discusses the public perception of preferential treatment for wealthy defendants.
This document is an FBI filing (FD-350) containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated July 26, 2006. The article details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein for felony solicitation of prostitution following a long investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, which involved trash sifting and surveillance. It notably highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the handling of the charges, as police believed there was probable cause for more serious charges involving minors.
This police incident report narrative details an attempt by Detectives Recarey and Caristo to interview a 17-year-old female in West Palm Beach regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness, who was described as crying and claiming to have put that life behind her, also stated she was 'in love' with Epstein and refused to speak; police accused her of providing other girls to Epstein. The report also details the analysis of a cell phone paid for by Epstein (billed to 457 Madison Ave, NYC), which revealed 87 pages of calls confirming that a redacted individual frequently contacted victims to notify them when Epstein was in town to 'work'.
This is an internal FBI administrative document dated November 9, 2006, from the West Palm Beach Resident Agency to the Miami Division. It requests holiday pay for a Special Agent to work on Veteran's Day (November 10, 2006) to gather data regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (Case ID 31E-MM-108062) in preparation for an 'Intelligent Analyst' arriving the following Monday. The investigation is categorized under WSTA (White Slave Traffic Act) - Child Prostitution.
This document is an FBI filing (FD-350) containing a newspaper clipping from the Palm Beach Post dated August 8, 2006. The article details the public defense strategy of Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by attorney Jack Goldberger and publicist Dan Klores, who labeled accusers as liars and denied any sex with minors occurred. The article notes that Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter referred the case to the FBI after a grand jury indicted Epstein on solicitation rather than more serious charges, despite an 11-month investigation.
This document is an FBI clipping preservation form containing a July 26, 2006 article from The Palm Beach Post. The article details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein on solicitation charges following a long investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, which included surveillance of his home and private jet. The text highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, noting that police believed there was probable cause for more serious charges involving minors.
This document consists of pages 140-141 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details a 1997 incident where a model named Alicia accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexual battery at a hotel (Shutters on the Beach), claiming he groped her while 'evaluating' her body. The text explains that although the reporting officer wrote 'Sexual Battery' on the report, the Santa Monica Police Department took no action, and Alicia eventually dropped the matter because she felt it was her word against a wealthy man.
This document is a printout of a NationMaster encyclopedia entry regarding West Palm Beach demographics based on 2000 Census data. It contains handwritten notes calculating the average number of people per household (2.36). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation file.
A presentation slide outlining a 'Desalination Plant Option' involving the City of West Palm Beach and the Town of Palm Beach. It details that the plant would be located on City property and that the Town would remain a customer of the City while incurring additional capital and operational costs. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016643.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity