Washington
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00028880.jpg
This document is page 21 of a 26-page TECS Person Query report from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, generated on July 23, 2019, by Interpol Washington. It indicates that for the subject of the query, there are zero records found under multiple categories, including warrant, ATF profile, baggage declaration, financial, employment, and pilot license information. The document is marked as law enforcement sensitive.
DOJ-OGR-00028879.jpg
This document is a U.S. Customs and Border Protection TECS Person Query report generated on July 23, 2019, by an individual at Interpol Washington. The report is heavily redacted, with all personal identifying information of the subject and the content of a remark dated July 1, 2019, blacked out under law enforcement exemptions. The document lists CBP Field Operations at JFK, New York as a point of contact.
DOJ-OGR-00028878.jpg
This is a U.S. Department of Homeland Security TECS (Treasury Enforcement Communications System) Person Query report for JEFFEREY EPSTEIN, generated by Interpol Washington on July 23, 2019. The document provides personal identifying information, including his date of birth (January 20, 1953) and twelve name aliases. It details a record entry on July 1, 2019, which was updated on July 3, 2019, and indicates a 'Primary Action' was effective from July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00028877.jpg
This is the cover page of a 26-page 'TECS - Person Query' report from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, dated July 23, 2019. The report was generated by an individual associated with Interpol Washington, but the subject of the query and all substantive information are heavily redacted under various Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemptions. The document is marked as 'For Official Use Only / Law Enforcement Sensitive'.
DOJ-OGR-00000534.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorneys Weinberg and Rossmiller discuss the history of the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Court, specifically referencing a March 2008 meeting in Washington between the defense and the DOJ's Criminal Division/Child Exploitation Unit. The discussion highlights that the defense argued the case lacked interstate elements needed for federal prosecution, and the DOJ subsequently issued a letter in May 2008 endorsing prosecutorial discretion due to the 'unusual' facts of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00022203.jpg
This document is a flight log for aircraft N908JE (G1159B) covering flights from October 15, 1994, to November 22, 1994. It details 19 flights, including a test flight, repositioning, and numerous passenger flights between various U.S. cities and South American destinations (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires). The log lists the pilot, David Rodgers, and several passengers or crew members identified by name or initials (JE, GM, Jerry, Female, Sophie Biddle, Frances, Rupert).
DOJ-OGR-00021907.jpg
This is a formal letter from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States, dated April 14, 2025, to the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The letter confirms the filing and docketing of a petition for a writ of certiorari for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. It specifies the petition was filed on April 10, 2025, and assigned the Supreme Court docket number 24-1073 on April 14, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00021682.jpg
This legal document is a filing that refutes claims made by Maxwell regarding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing argues that Maxwell's assertion of senior-level Justice Department approval for the NPA is a mischaracterization of the record, stating that any review by offices like the Deputy Attorney General's occurred only after the NPA was signed and in response to Epstein's actions, and did not constitute an approval of the agreement itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
This document details the tense negotiations between the USAO (Acosta) and Epstein's defense team (Starr, Lefkowitz, Dershowitz) in December 2007. Following defense submissions, the USAO initiated a de novo review of evidence by Criminal Chief Robert Senior and held a meeting in Miami on December 14, 2007, where the defense argued state charges did not apply. The defense subsequently threatened to seek review from DOJ Washington (AAG Fisher), prompting Acosta to request an expedited review to preserve a scheduled January 4th plea date.
DOJ-OGR-00021297.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the friction between US Attorney Alexander Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (specifically Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz) regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Acosta expresses frustration with the defense's 'collateral challenges' and lack of finality, setting a strict deadline of December 7, 2007, for them to commit to the agreement or face trial. The text highlights Acosta's internal justification to OPR regarding his handling of the breach of agreement risks and the involvement of DOJ Headquarters.
DOJ-OGR-00016594.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. In the testimony, Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations. They highlight their past leadership roles, including serving as president for the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association (twice), and divisions of the American Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00013970.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations, including the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association, and the American Psychological Association, highlighting past presidencies and other leadership roles within these groups.
DOJ-OGR-00010425.jpg
This legal document, part of a court case, argues against the application of the 2004 Sentencing Guidelines for a defendant whose criminal conduct is alleged to have ended 'in or about 2004'. The filing contends that applying the later, harsher guidelines would be an ex post facto violation, as the jury never made a specific factual finding that the conduct continued past the 2004 Guidelines' effective date. It further argues that having the court, rather than the jury, determine the offense end date would violate the defendant's (Ms. Maxwell's) Sixth Amendment rights.
DOJ-OGR-00003057.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing arguing against a defendant's motion to suppress evidence based on the Fifth Amendment. The central argument is that the evidence, obtained from depositions conducted by the private law firm Boies Schiller in a separate civil case, is admissible because Boies Schiller was not an agent of the Government, and therefore the defendant's statements were not compelled by the state. The document cites multiple legal precedents to establish that the Fifth Amendment only protects against officially coerced self-incrimination.
DOJ-OGR-00032507.jpg
This document contains four handwritten phone message slips addressed to 'J.E.' (Jeffrey Epstein) dated between January 20 and January 22, 2005. Notable messages include a return call from Nathan Myhrvold (relayed by Claudia) and personal messages from Alicia, Eva, and Anya asking for return calls or notifying him of their attempts to reach him. The document includes phone numbers with area codes for Washington state (425) and Miami (305).
DOJ-OGR-00025289.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 23, 2019, concerning a draft report titled 'Epstein.76318-054.ReconstructionReport.draft3.docx'. The National Suicide Prevention Coordinator for the Federal Bureau of Prisons initially circulates the draft to James Wills, Michael Carvajal, and Jeffery Keller for review. Hugh Hurwitz then forwards the email, praising the report as 'outstanding' despite its creation without interviews or video, and instructs the recipient to prepare a final draft for him to give to 'the director'.
DOJ-OGR-00002794.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing by attorney William Julié in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 23, 2021. The filing argues against an extradition request by citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It specifically quotes articles that protect nationals from extradition, emphasizing that nationality should be assessed at the time of the alleged offense.
DOJ-OGR-00005186.jpg
This document is a page of handwritten legal notes filed on October 12, 2021, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text presents a legal argument focusing on 'Plain Language' statutory interpretation, specifically distinguishing between 'exploitation' and 'sexual or physical abuse.' The author cites several legal precedents (Patterson v. Schriro, US v. Pharis, US v. Dodge) and criticizes the Fifth Circuit for ignoring guidance regarding statutory construction and the misfiling of statute of limitation language in 1990.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019847.jpg
This document is a page from a larger report (identified by the House Oversight footer) analyzing the tenure of Preet Bharara at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It criticizes the office for failing to prosecute individual banking executives following the 2008 financial crisis, noting that while firms like SAC Capital and JPMorgan Chase faced fines or pleas, individuals (with the exception of Kareem Serageldin) generally avoided criminal charges. The text discusses the jurisdictional habits of the SDNY and its handling of cases related to the Madoff Ponzi scheme and mortgage-backed securities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019819.jpg
This document is page 331 of a 'Selected Bibliography' from a book or report, likely produced on September 30, 2016, and stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The content lists journalistic sources regarding Edward Snowden, the NSA, and espionage, citing publications like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Vice. The footer filename 'Epst_9780451494566...' corresponds to the ISBN for the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, suggesting this document is related to the journalist Edward Jay Epstein rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019809.jpg
This document is page 321 from the endnotes of a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein given the file name and context) regarding Edward Snowden. It lists sources for pages 169-182 of the main text, citing interviews with anonymous NSA and Senate Intelligence Committee officials, as well as articles from the Guardian, RT, NYT, and The Intercept between 2013 and 2016. The notes cover Snowden's legal representation, his time in Russia and Hong Kong, and media coverage by Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019574.jpg
This document appears to be page 86 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely authored by Edward Jay Epstein, given the footer filename 'Epst_'), produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the interactions between journalist Glenn Greenwald and Guardian editor Janine Gibson regarding the Edward Snowden NSA leaks. It covers Gibson's reluctance to publish Snowden's manifesto (comparing it to the Unabomber's), her authorization of Greenwald's trip to Hong Kong, and the assignment of veteran journalist Ewen MacAskill to accompany him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019439.jpg
Maureen Dowd's column criticizes the Clinton family for blurring the lines between public service, charity, and personal enrichment through the Clinton Foundation and associated ventures. The article highlights potential conflicts of interest involving aides like Doug Band and Teneo, and contrasts the Clintons' aggressive fundraising with the modest post-presidency of Harry Truman. It draws on reporting about internal tensions at the foundation and questions the ethical implications of their financial network.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019430.jpg
This document is a media digest or article from the Guardian blog by Mark Tran, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019430). It discusses the efficacy of development awards, highlighting 'Sunlite' solar lanterns used in refugee camps and mentioning various humanitarian organizations including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Mo Ibrahim Foundation. While part of a production likely related to investigations involving high-profile figures, the text itself focuses strictly on global health initiatives and technology awards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019290.jpg
This document is page 56 of a report titled 'Breaking Down Democracy,' likely published by Freedom House around 2016. It discusses the rise of populist politics, 'illiberal democracies,' and the stability of authoritarian regimes. The page includes nine citations to various articles and reports regarding human rights and politics in Venezuela, Egypt, Bahrain, China, and Turkey. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, though the specific page content does not directly mention Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity