| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Eysenck
|
Academic professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Arrest of Stork and Hagen (The Quincy House Two) for screening Deep Throat. | Quincy House / Cambridge Po... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of civil rights action against DA Droney. | Boston Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Stork and Hagen. | Court | View |
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz) submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee. The text details the author's legal philosophy, specifically their refusal to represent 'professional criminals' or fugitives, and recounts their decision to decline representing Igal Amir, the assassin of Yitzhak Rabin, due to the author's objection to the 'rodef' political defense. The document contains a draft date of 4.2.12 and a word count.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated draft 4.2.12) written by an attorney (historically identifiable as Alan Dershowitz) recounting the 'Quincy House Two' case at Harvard. It details the arrest of two students, Stork and Hagen, for screening the film *Deep Throat*, the subsequent protests, and the successful legal defense against District Attorney Droney, who was accused of acting as a censor. The text discusses the irony of censorship attempts and the disparity between legal rulings and public reality regarding obscenity.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of 'Deep Throat', Harvard's Quincy House, and the legal defense style, though his name is not explicitly in the text) included in House Oversight files. It details a court hearing where a Judge Alberti viewed the film 'Deep Throat' to determine if it was obscene under Massachusetts law, ultimately deciding it was 'trash' but not legally obscene. The narrative concludes with the author addressing protesters and students at Quincy House regarding free speech rights.
This document appears to be page 29 of a scientific paper or book discussing behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology. It details a comparative study of C57BL and BALB mouse strains regarding dominance, sexual competition, and personality traits, applying Eysenck's categories (psychoticism, extroversion, neuroticism). The text also references twin studies by B. Loehlen and G. Methany regarding the heritability of personality traits in humans. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity