park bench
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017651.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Jane (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony covers Jane's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, confirming Maxwell's presence during an initial meeting where Epstein offered scholarships and asked for Jane's mother's phone number. The defense also questions inconsistencies regarding whether Jane was alone or with friends on a park bench and establishes that Epstein's office called Jane's mother shortly after she returned to school.
DOJ-OGR-00016128.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. In it, the presiding judge instructs the jury on their fundamental duties, emphasizing that the judge decides the law while the jury are the 'triers of fact.' The judge defines what constitutes legal evidence—such as witness testimony and admitted documents—and begins to list items that must not be considered evidence, like lawyers' arguments, to ensure a fair verdict based only on the facts presented.
DOJ-OGR-00017109.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense argues that the accuser 'Jane's' memories have been manipulated by 'post-event suggestion' and financial motives, citing inconsistencies between her current testimony and a 2015 story she told the press. The attorney highlights testimony from witnesses Juan Alessi and Larry Visoski to contend that Jane was older than 14 when she met Epstein and that she initially visited Epstein's house with her mother and brothers, not alone.
DOJ-OGR-00014488.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger in a criminal case. Menninger argues that the testimony of a witness, "Jane," is unreliable, claiming her memory has been manipulated by "post-event suggestion" and money over 25 years. Menninger highlights inconsistencies in Jane's story, such as her age and how she met Epstein, contrasting her account with testimony from Juan Alessi and Larry Visoski to discredit the prosecution's narrative and absolve "Ghislaine" of targeting Jane.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity