| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A witness (A) testifies before a grand jury about obtaining telephone records via subpoenas to sh... | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a legal publication (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. It analyzes state laws (specifically Hawaii, Colorado, Missouri, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Idaho) regarding crime victims' rights to notification and consultation prior to the filing of formal charges or plea agreements. The text serves as legal precedent or comparative analysis, likely relevant to arguments concerning the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein case.
This document appears to be page 100 of a legal review article authored by Paul Cassell (a lawyer for Epstein's victims), submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes state laws (CO, MO, NJ, MA, ID) that extend victims' rights to the pre-charge stage and require prosecutor consultation regarding plea agreements. This legal argument is central to the Epstein case controversy, specifically regarding the secret Non-Prosecution Agreement signed before federal charges were filed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity