Elizabeth
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's upcoming sentencing, where victims Sarah and Elizabeth have the right to deliver an in-... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's criminal sentencing, at which victims Sarah and Elizabeth are entitled to read their vi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Prosecution and conviction of Maxwell. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00022307.jpg
This document is page 22 of a contact list, likely an address book, containing entries for individuals whose last names begin with 'E'. The list includes individuals and couples, but their personal contact information has been redacted, as noted at the top of the page. The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00022307.
DOJ-OGR-00010710.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that victims identified as Sarah and Elizabeth should be permitted to read their victim impact statements aloud at Maxwell's criminal sentencing. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Wilson and Kelly v. California, to support the court's authority to consider such testimony and asserts that doing so will not cause unfair prejudice to Maxwell. A footnote clarifies that Maxwell does not have the right to cross-examine victims during sentencing hearings.
DOJ-OGR-00010705.jpg
This page from a legal document discusses the psychological impact of crime on victims, citing academic research on PTSD and other traumas. It highlights the therapeutic value of victim impact statements in sentencing, referencing a study from Australia. The document concludes by stating that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth have already benefited from the prosecution and conviction of an individual named Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00010700.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that federal courts have extremely broad and largely unlimited authority to consider information about a defendant during sentencing. It cites legal precedents and the federal statute 18 U.S.C. ยง 3661, which states 'no limitation' shall be placed on such information. The document specifically mentions that crucial information about an individual named Maxwell's 'background, character, and conduct' was possessed by two other individuals, Sarah and Elizabeth.
DOJ-OGR-00010698.jpg
This legal document argues that victims, specifically Sarah and Elizabeth, have a right under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to deliver in-court statements at the sentencing of the defendant, Maxwell. It cites legal precedents and legislative intent to support the importance of these "victim impact statements," asserting they are crucial for ensuring victims are heard and for determining an appropriate punishment based on the harm caused.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity