This document is page 805 from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765), specifically regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' in the S.D.N.Y. It outlines the legal standards for establishing personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants based on a 'conspiracy theory' under New York law (C.P.L.R. ยง 302(a)(2)). The text cites numerous precedents to explain that plaintiffs must prove a corrupt agreement, an overt act, intentional participation, and resulting damage to link a defendant to a conspiracy committed in New York. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely included in an investigation file to establish legal precedent for jurisdiction over entities involved in complex conspiracies, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
This document displays a May 10, 2017 email exchange where Barclays CEO Jes Staley was duped by an email prankster impersonating Barclays Chairman John McFarlane. Staley sends a heartfelt thank you for support against a 'rally for [his] head,' praising the prankster's 'guile.' The prankster's replies, from a fake Gmail account, adopt a conspiratorial tone, asking 'who should we seek to silence next!?'
This document, from a House Oversight collection, displays two separate email communications from May 10, 2017, involving Barclays' then-CEO Jes Staley. The first is a legitimate exchange where Staley thanks Chairman John McFarlane for his support; the second is a noted 'Prankster's email' sent to Staley by an impersonator of McFarlane, containing provocative language like 'who should we seek to silence next!?'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity