National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Winston & Strawn LLP
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00000201.tif
This document is an 'Interest of Amici' section, likely from a legal brief, detailing the role and mission of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). It describes NACDL as a nonprofit professional bar association founded in 1958, dedicated to ensuring justice and due process for criminal defendants and advancing the fair administration of justice, with a nationwide membership including various legal professionals. The document also includes a disclaimer regarding the authorship and funding of the brief pursuant to Supreme Court Rules.
DOJ-OGR-00020567.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 22-1426 involving Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from February 4 to February 16, 2022. It details legal maneuvers surrounding Maxwell's motion for a new trial, including disputes over sealing documents, the intervention of 'Juror 50,' and an amicus brief request by the NACDL. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders denying the blanket sealing of new trial documents and setting deadlines for amicus briefs.
DOJ-OGR-00009109.jpg
This document is the Introduction page of a legal filing (Document 614) submitted on February 24, 2022, by the NACDL in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The text argues that a fair trial depends on unbiased juries and specifically addresses the controversy surrounding 'Juror No. 50,' stating that he gave untrue answers regarding his own history of sexual abuse victimization during voir dire. The filing emphasizes the difficulty of eliminating bias in sexual abuse cases and the necessity of truthful answers for the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00008918.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 9, 2022, from the law firm Winston & Strawn LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. Writing on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), the firm requests permission to file an amicus curiae brief addressing post-trial revelations about Juror # 50 and the potential impact on the defendant's right to a fair trial. The letter outlines the specific legal issues NACDL intends to address, including voir dire in high-profile cases and juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00008916.jpg
This document is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 11, 2022, in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is a response to a request from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) to file an amicus brief regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial. The judge sets a deadline of February 18, 2022, for any party to file such a motion and outlines four specific requirements that must be met for the court to consider it.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017707.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 72 of 78 in the production) bearing the name of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein. The text presents a legal argument regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victim status and rights should apply even to crimes that have not yet been charged, citing Senator Kyl's legislative intent. It criticizes the NACDL's proposal for fact-finding hearings to determine victim status and argues against the Advisory Committee's limitations on victims' rights in proposed rules. The document appears to be part of an evidentiary submission to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the investigation into the handling of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement and the violation of victims' rights.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity