Unnamed law firm
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alleged Victims
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-26 | Legal deadline | Deadline for the law firm to file its objections to the proposed subpoena on the public docket. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Judge Nathan issues order regarding defense subpoena of victims' law firm, requiring the firm to ... | Court | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Order regarding Rule 17(c) subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims. | Court | View |
EFTA00024166.pdf
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 24, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a defense application to subpoena a law firm representing alleged victims for personal or confidential information. The court establishes a schedule for the law firm to formally file its objections (treated as a motion to quash) by March 26, 2021, and outlines procedures for redactions and subsequent responses.
DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 covering the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail and her subsequent appeal of that decision. It also details a legal dispute regarding a defense subpoena targeting a law firm representing alleged victims, with Judge Nathan ordering the firm to formally file objections to protect victim privacy under Rule 17(c)(3). The document lists various filings including letters from prosecutors (AUSAs) and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00022008.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 10, 2020. In it, a defense attorney argues for an adjournment, stating that their small law firm requires more than 90 days to prepare a defense, which involves reviewing at least 25 witness statements and tracking down witnesses. The attorney contrasts their limited resources with the extensive time and resources the federal government used to investigate and bring an indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00019794.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering March 22-24, 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's third motion for bail and Maxwell subsequently filing a Notice of Appeal. Additionally, a significant order was issued regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, setting protocols for victim notification and filing objections to the subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00009491.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, likely from a defense attorney's argument. The speaker challenges the government's assertion that an individual 'must have known' about illegal backdated financial transactions simply because he had worked as a junior accountant in the 1980s. The attorney argues this claim of 'mens rea' (guilty knowledge) is not supported by evidence and is not a strong argument according to Second Circuit precedent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity