wjavocats.com
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001272.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié, dated May 23, 2021. Julié argues that the intention of French lawmakers regarding Article 696-4 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure was not to protect individuals from extradition after they have lost their French nationality. He supports this by citing past instances where the French government deported such individuals for criminal offenses.
DOJ-OGR-00001269.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief authored by attorney William Julié, filed on May 23, 2021. The brief argues that under French law, the prohibition on extraditing nationals should only apply to individuals who are French citizens at the time of the extradition request, not to those who have lost their citizenship. This interpretation aims to prevent the fraudulent acquisition of nationality as a means to escape justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002223.jpg
This legal document, authored by French lawyer William Julié on December 18, 2020, is a response to a US government memorandum regarding a defendant's motion for release. Julié refutes the US government's interpretation of a letter from the French Minister of Justice, arguing that their analysis of French extradition law is incomplete. He asserts that under the French Constitution (Article 55) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Article 696), international treaties—such as the extradition treaty between the US and France—prevail over domestic law, meaning the key issue is the treaty's terms, not general French legislation.
DOJ-OGR-00002144.jpg
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié, analyzes the legal framework surrounding the extradition of a country's own nationals, with a specific focus on France and its treaty with the USA. It contrasts different legal approaches under international law, noting that some countries constitutionally prohibit extraditing citizens while others, particularly common law jurisdictions, permit it. The document also examines European law, including the European Convention on Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant, which has different rules for member states.
DOJ-OGR-00002141.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié regarding the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from France to the USA. The filing argues that under the US-France Extradition Treaty, a claim of political motivation is unlikely to succeed in preventing her extradition, citing a history of French courts granting US requests and distinguishing her case from a past instance where extradition to Russia was denied on political grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00002137.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, authored by attorney William Julié. It describes the procedural step of making a potential application to the European Court of Human Rights against France once all domestic legal options have been exhausted. The document also notes the possibility of requesting interim measures, such as suspending an applicant's extradition, pending the court's decision.
DOJ-OGR-00002136.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It states a key procedural requirement from the 1996 US-France Extradition Treaty, specifying that a person subject to an extradition decree must be handed over within one month of notification.
DOJ-OGR-00002128.jpg
This document, part of a legal case filed on December 14, 2020, is a legal opinion from attorney William Julié regarding extradition procedures. It outlines the roles of the Public Prosecutor and the Investigating Chamber, and explains that while there is no specific timeframe for a final government decree, the process can be expedited to a few weeks if the request is deemed urgent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity