Person B
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed reporter from Reuters
|
Professional interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed reporter from the Daily Mail
|
Professional interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | Legal proceeding / questioning | An unnamed person is questioned about their answers on a jury questionnaire (specifically Questio... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009650.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated March 1, 2022, detailing the questioning of an individual about their answers on a jury questionnaire. The questioning focuses on their responses regarding impartiality (Question 41) and personal history with sexual abuse (Question 48), and highlights inconsistencies between their questionnaire answers and statements made in subsequent interviews with reporters from Reuters and the Daily Mail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013867.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a productivity book or manual (likely 'The 4-Hour Workweek' or similar literature) included within a House Oversight Committee file dump. It provides advice on productivity, email management, and scheduling efficiency, recommending specific software tools like YouMail, Doodle, TimeDriver, and Xobni. While the footer indicates it is part of a government investigation ('HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013867'), the text itself contains generic advice and lists no specific individuals, crimes, or events related to the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg
This document is page 122 of a rough draft transcript from a legal deposition, likely related to a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness (a former prosecutor from the Eastern District of Virginia) about the admissibility of a third party's Fifth Amendment invocation as evidence in criminal versus civil cases. Mr. Scarola is also present as counsel. The witness discusses their experience with approximately 20 trials involving drug dealers and gun runners but cannot recall specific instances of using the Fifth Amendment in the manner described.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021941.jpg
This document is page 118 of a rough draft transcript, likely from a Congressional hearing or deposition (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). The dialogue concerns a previous deposition where a subject (possibly Mr. Dershowitz or an associate like Epstein) broadly invoked the Fifth Amendment and used tactics to feign ignorance of people he knew. The witness and questioner discuss the legal implications of taking the Fifth in civil litigation within the jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit (Florida), specifically whether one person's invocation can be used as evidence against another.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018485.jpg
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018485', is an essay discussing sex-positive feminism, the nuances of consent, and the importance of communication. The author argues for understanding indirect refusals, deconstructing sexual stereotypes, and approaching sex as a collaborative act, citing Thomas MacAulay Millar's work. While the document's label suggests it is part of an official investigation, the text itself is philosophical and contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
Jury questionnaire and personal experiences with sexual a...
The person being questioned told a Reuters reporter that they "flew through" the questionnaire and did not recall being asked about personal experiences with sexual abuse.
Jury questionnaire and sexual abuse history
The person being questioned told a Daily Mail reporter they weren't asked about their sexual abuse history. When informed about Question 48, they said they didn't remember it but did recall a question about a family member being abused.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity