This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Swain during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The testimony focuses on a woman named Annie, detailing her travels to Thailand and Mexico, her attendance at an Ivy League college, and the fact that she worked to pay for her Thailand trip herself. Crucially, the defense establishes that Jeffrey Epstein did not pay for Annie's college education and questions the witness's knowledge of what Ghislaine Maxwell knew about Annie's movements.
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Swain. The testimony focuses on an individual named Annie, detailing her travels to Thailand and Mexico, her attendance at an Ivy League college, and clarifying that she worked to pay for her Thailand trip and that Jeffrey Epstein did not pay for her college tuition. There is also a discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell potentially picking Annie up from an airport.
This document appears to be page 297 of a draft manuscript or legal text (dated 4.2.12 at the top) produced during a House Oversight investigation. It analyzes the Supreme Court's *Bakke* decision, critiquing Justice Powell's opinion and comparing the affirmative action policies of Harvard College versus UC Davis. The text argues that Harvard's 'holistic' approach, which includes legacy preferences ('genealogy') and vague factors, may be less fair than Davis's explicit quotas, favoring wealthy minority applicants over disadvantaged ones.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity