us Gov't
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Schulte
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | N/A | Deadline for Government reply to Epstein bail motion | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Deadline or calendar event for: Gov't reply to Epstein bail motion due | Court (Implied) | View |
EFTA00032983.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry from July 2019 marking a deadline for the Government's reply to Jeffrey Epstein's bail motion. The event is scheduled for July 12, 2019, with the location listed as 'Berman' (likely referencing Geoffrey Berman/SDNY). The attendee's identity is redacted.
EFTA00032982.pdf
This document is an email notification, likely a calendar acceptance, dated July 8, 2019. The subject line confirms a deadline or scheduled event regarding the Government's reply to a bail motion for Jeffrey Epstein. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00028208.pdf
An email dated November 7, 2021, discussing a draft 'Gov't Letter' concerning 'MV-3' (likely Minor Victim 3). The sender expresses doubt about the current draft and suggests adding 'hooks' for a specific redacted individual before the recipient meets with 'the team'.
EFTA00026647.pdf
This document is an email record, specifically a calendar acceptance notification, dated July 10, 2019. The subject indicates a deadline for the Government to reply to a bail motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein. The sender and recipient information is redacted, and the document includes a Bates stamp EFTA00026647.
EFTA00022996.pdf
An email dated April 26, 2021, discussing a draft 'STA exclusion letter' (Speedy Trial Act) to be filed later that week. The attachment filename '2021-04-XX_GM_Gov't_Letter_re_Exclusion_of_Time.docx' suggests this corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell (GM) trial proceedings involving the Government.
EFTA00019194.pdf
An email exchange dated October 10, 2021, between unidentified parties (likely legal counsel) discussing the formatting and sharing of the 'Maxwell Jury Questionnaire' and a 'Joint Proposed Voir Dire' document. The sender expresses concern about accurately applying color-coded formatting changes (red to green, blue to purple) likely representing edits from the Defense and Government teams.
EFTA00019193.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 10, 2021, transmitting a document titled 'Maxwell Jury Questionnaire'. The attachment appears to be a legal draft coordinating jury selection questions between the Defense and the Government (prosecution), likely for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00015835.pdf
An email dated August 22, 2021, discussing a draft letter to Judge 'AJN' (likely Alison J. Nathan) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints about VTC (Video Teleconference) access at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The sender notes a deadline of the following day and mentions coordinating with MDC legal counsel for review.
EFTA00010189.pdf
An internal government email dated December 2, 2020, addressed to 'Chiefs' submitting a draft legal letter for review. The draft responds to Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for redactions and an 'in camera' proceeding, following an order from Judge Nathan. The email includes several attachments relating to sealing motions and bail motions.
DOJ-OGR-00002838.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court order filed on March 24, 2021, in the case United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC). The text details the Court's rejection of the defendant's (Schulte) challenges regarding jury selection, specifically concerning the 'fair cross-section' requirement of the Sixth Amendment and an 'Equal Protection' challenge under the Fifth Amendment. The Court dismisses arguments regarding the underrepresentation of African American and Hispanic American jurors, citing a lack of discriminatory intent and noting that a technical glitch in the White Plains master wheel actually increased minority representation rather than diminishing it.
DOJ-OGR-00002835.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court order filed on August 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). The text analyzes a Sixth Amendment challenge regarding jury underrepresentation, specifically examining the 'absolute disparity method' for African American and Hispanic American representation in the White Plains master jury wheel. The Court concludes that the statistical disparities (1.25% and 1.15%) are within tolerated legal limits based on Second Circuit precedents and that Schulte has failed to meet the necessary burden for his claim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027161.jpg
This document is a forensic log of text/email messages from February 18, 2017, between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a verified alias of Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation discusses a strategy to 'push cyber' to help the Trump administration, mentions 'BG' (likely Bill Gates) regarding his foundation's commitments and reliance on government influence, and notes an upcoming meeting between Epstein and 'BG' scheduled for the following Friday. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025874.jpg
An email exchange from January 2015 between David Stern and Jeffrey Epstein (via jeevacation@gmail.com) regarding a lawsuit involving 'Doe 3' and the US Government. Epstein vehemently denies allegations that Bill Clinton visited his property, citing Secret Service records and calling claims about Ghislaine Maxwell flying a helicopter 'lies' and 'bulshit'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity