Nesbitt Kuyrkendall

Person
Mentions
17
Relationships
1
Events
5
Documents
8

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Richards
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Investigation The witness (Richards) and Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall were interviewing witnesses together. Palm Beach View
2008-01-31 N/A Victim interviews conducted. Unknown View
2007-01-01 N/A FBI investigation into Epstein; agents Slater and Kuyrkendall contact Roberts. Phone call View
2007-01-01 N/A FBI investigation into Epstein active; Agents Slater and Kuyrkendall attempt to contact Roberts. N/A View
2005-10-20 N/A Execution of search warrant. 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Bea... View

061.pdf

This document is a Supplemental Appendix filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. in a Florida state court case involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a transcript of a June 2009 hearing regarding the unsealing of court records, administrative orders, case law, and federal court filings including a declaration by AUSA A. Marie Villafana regarding the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The appendix documents the legal arguments surrounding the transparency of the Epstein proceedings and the government's interaction with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

Legal appendix containing transcripts, court orders, motions, and declarations
2025-12-26

018.pdf

This document is a Motion for Stay filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in a civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe. They argue that a stay is mandatory under federal law because of a pending federal criminal investigation/action (the deferred prosecution agreement). Attached is a declaration from AUSA A. Marie Villafana detailing the government's interaction with victims (T.M., C.W., S.R.) and providing copies of notification letters sent to them and their attorneys regarding their rights and the non-prosecution agreement.

Legal motion for stay (civil case) with attached declaration and exhibits (us attorney letters)
2025-12-26

EFTA00020711.pdf

This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.

Privilege log (second supplemental privilege log - box #4)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00016786.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Richards, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning first establishes Richards's methods for interviewing witnesses, focusing on listening for accurate details and gathering information. The focus then shifts to Richards's work in Palm Beach around 2007, specifically their professional partnership with an Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, with whom they interviewed witnesses.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016397.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on whether her personal experiences and training as a psychologist lend her credibility, and probes into a 2006 conversation she had with FBI Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall. A question about whether she told the agent she wanted a 'Mr. Epstein' prosecuted is met with a sustained objection.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013772.jpg

This document is a segment of a court transcript from the cross-examination of A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony covers her credibility, her public identity as a psychologist, and her 2006 interaction with FBI Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall concerning Mr. Epstein. An objection by Ms. Pomerantz is sustained by the Court, with Ms. Menninger also speaking.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017970.jpg

This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in 2019. It details Virginia Roberts' (Giuffre) recollections of 2007, including intimidating calls from Epstein and Maxwell, and her skepticism regarding FBI agents Slater and Kuyrkendall, whom she feared were Epstein associates. The text also covers her 2011 public accusations against Prince Andrew and her 2015 affidavit implicating Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.

News article (miami herald) filed as court exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017807.jpg

This document is a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit detailing Virginia Roberts' interactions with the FBI in 2007, whom she distrusted fearing they were Epstein associates. It discusses her 2011 public allegations against Prince Andrew and a 2015 affidavit implicating Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. A photo of Roberts and Prince Andrew is included.

News article / court exhibit
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity