MDC

Organization
Mentions
795
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
392
Also known as:
MDC legal counsel MDC in Brooklyn Brooklyn MDC MDC Los Angeles MDC/BOP

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00030906.pdf

This document contains a chain of emails from August 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) regarding the logistics of delivering legal discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss protocols for hard drive delivery, including password protection, authorization memos, and the use of FedEx. There is also a strategic discussion about cumulative loading of discovery onto single disks to prevent the inmate from accumulating too many hard drives in her cell.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00030880.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030872.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 7-8, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely BOP/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The AUSA requested permission for Maxwell's defense counsel to hand-deliver a hard drive containing discovery materials to the MDC because Maxwell could not view the previous CD and the AUSA's office could not deliver it before the weekend. The request was denied, with the respondent stating the materials must come directly from the US Attorney's office.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030870.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 2021 coordinating the physical delivery of two hard drives to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) arranged for an FBI Special Agent to transport the drives from the SDNY office at 1 St. Andrew's Plaza to the MDC on 29th Avenue. The chain confirms the logistics of the meeting and verifies that the handover went smoothly.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030868.pdf

This document is an email chain from January 2021 regarding the logistical coordination between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), the FBI, and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The emails discuss the preparation and handoff of two hard drives containing legal discovery materials intended for Ghislaine Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney arranged for an FBI Special Agent to physically deliver the drives to the MDC.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00030861.pdf

This document is an email chain and legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. Defense attorney Christian Everdell lists eight specific issues, including the urgent need for a hard drive for Maxwell to review evidence in prison, missing subscriber info for AT&T documents, and specifically noting that the first 27 pages of flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers ('Rodgers000001-000027') were missing. The defense also inquires about a Daily Beast article referencing a cell-site simulator affidavit that they believe was not properly unsealed.

Email chain / legal discovery request
2025-12-25

EFTA00030757.pdf

This document contains an email chain forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The NEF details a court order by Judge J. Nathan dated December 8, 2020, which denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify about her confinement conditions. However, the order mandates that the Government submit written updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials and ability to communicate with counsel.

Court notice / email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030686.pdf

This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The filing is a Court Order dated December 8, 2020, in which Judge Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify regarding her conditions of confinement. The order mandates that the Government provide written updates on Maxwell's conditions, specifically regarding legal access, every 60 days.

Court notice / email (notice of electronic filing)
2025-12-25

EFTA00030562.pdf

This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 9, 2020. It confirms the readiness of the 'Sixth Production' of discovery materials for the defense in the 'US v. Maxwell' case, specifically mentioning the upload of iPhone data labeled 'NYC024318 1B71'. The email also discusses the creation of a specific index and drive for the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center).

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030487.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and recipients likely within the BOP/MDC (Nicole McFarland, Sophia Papapetru). The discussion concerns a letter to Judge Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions. Specific complaints raised include a staff member potentially exposed to COVID-19 continuing to work, a staff member taking unauthorized photos of Maxwell in her cell, and Maxwell's deteriorating mental health due to sleep deprivation and constant surveillance.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030430.pdf

An email chain from August 13, 2020, involving USANYS staff and James Margolin (PIO). They discuss a filing deadline regarding a defense motion to move Ghislaine Maxwell to general population or improve her access to discovery materials. Margolin highlights that Main Justice (OPA) and the Attorney General are closely monitoring the situation due to political pressure from Congressional Republicans regarding inmate safety, following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein the previous summer.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00030417.pdf

This document is an email chain from late November to December 1, 2020, between officials at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They are coordinating a legal response regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically involving a 'joint letter' to the Court and interactions with the BOP and MDC legal team. The correspondence notes that 'Bobbi and Chris' (likely defense counsel) rejected a proposal, necessitating the drafting of a new letter and affidavit regarding a defense request concerning the MDC warden.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00030386.pdf

This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Bureau of Prisons/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's initial custody conditions from July 6 to July 13, 2020. The correspondence coordinates urgent legal calls for Maxwell ahead of deadlines set by Judge Nathan and her arraignment, with BOP officials noting she is receiving more access than typical inmates. The chain concludes with the prosecution seeking confirmation that Maxwell is housed in a single cell separated from other inmates for security reasons to include in a public filing.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030083.pdf

An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production. The email confirms the production of materials related to victims not referenced in the specific indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), pursuant to a court order from November 2020. The prosecutor requests an FTP link for transfer and notes that a CD copy will be sent to the MDC for Maxwell to review.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00030021.pdf

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials (specifically nude images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices), the transport of physical evidence (including massage tables, plaster busts, and a stuffed dog) from the FBI Bronx warehouse to the courthouse, and the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street. The prosecution refuses to transport bulky items or obscene digital material freely, requiring the defense to view some items at the warehouse or on specific laptops under supervision.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00029971.pdf

Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 25, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to be released into the general prison population. The court ruled the request for victim identities was premature as discovery had just begun, and found that the Bureau of Prisons was already providing sufficient access to legal materials (13 hours a day). The court ordered the Government to provide status updates on Maxwell's confinement conditions every 90 days.

Memorandum opinion and order
2025-12-25

EFTA00029294.pdf

This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government representatives (including Christian Everdell). Sternheim complains that legal materials (a hard drive and books) sent by the government via FedEx were delivered to the MDC on October 12, 2021, but had not been given to Maxwell as of October 14. The document includes screenshots of FedEx tracking information (Tracking #8166 1429 9130 and #8166 1429 9141) confirming delivery to Brooklyn, NY.

Email correspondence with attachments (screenshots)
2025-12-25

EFTA00029273.pdf

This document contains an email chain from November 2020 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and staff at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The correspondence coordinates the physical delivery of a laptop and a hard drive containing new discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell (Reg. No. 02879-509) to assist in her legal defense review. The emails confirm the drop-off location at the MDC East Building and schedule the delivery time.

Email chain / correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00029238.pdf

This document is an email chain from April 8, 2021, initiated by Reuters correspondent Jonathan Stempel seeking comment from the government (likely SDNY/DOJ) regarding a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers. Stempel asks about the DOJ's response to claims that disclosing prison condition details at MDC might poison the jury pool. Internal government emails show officials flagging the inquiry, noting it relates to a 'HIPAA issue,' and stating they declined to comment.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00029236.pdf

This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Sternheim is sending a courtesy copy of an ECF filing, specifically a reply letter concerning the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center), to redacted recipients and co-counsel including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00029224.pdf

An internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated October 5, 2021. The email confirms that a thumb drive provided by defense counsel has been loaded with the latest discovery production for Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') and asks colleagues to approve attached letters associated with the transfer.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00028845.pdf

This document is an email chain from March 2021 concerning the US v. Maxwell case, specifically regarding requests from defense counsel to view highly confidential images and physical evidence. The emails detail logistics for reviewing evidence, including questions about image formats, metadata, the need for multiple laptops for review, inventory lists of physical items, and proposed dates and locations for the review at 500 Pearl Street.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00028758.pdf

An email header document dated October 28, 2020, with the subject 'RE: laptop for MDC'. The correspondence involves the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and likely relates to logistical arrangements (a laptop) for the Metropolitan Detention Center, possibly concerning legal discovery or defense preparation for a detainee (contextually likely Ghislaine Maxwell given the date and agencies involved).

Email header / correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00028646.pdf

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.

Email correspondence / legal discovery dispute
2025-12-25

EFTA00028571.pdf

This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.

Legal correspondence (email chain)
2025-12-25
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity