Judge Pucillo

Person
Mentions
10
Relationships
1
Events
4
Documents
5

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Defendant judge
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-06-28 N/A Sentencing Hearing Unknown View
2008-06-30 N/A Bench conference where Judge Pucillo accepted the plea agreement. Court View
2008-06-30 N/A Plea Conference in State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein Palm Beach County Courthouse View
2008-01-01 N/A Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Pucillo ordered Defendant Epstein not to have any contact, direct ... Palm Beach Circuit Court View

035.pdf

This document is a motion filed on June 2, 2009, by The Palm Beach Post seeking to intervene in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein to unseal a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum. The Post argues that the sealing was improper, lacked necessary legal findings, and that the documents are of significant public interest given the accusations of soliciting minors. The document cites numerous civil lawsuits against Epstein and criticizes the secrecy surrounding his plea deal.

Legal motion (motion to intervene and petition for access)
2025-12-26

030.pdf

This document is a 'Notice of Joinder' filed on June 8, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join a motion for a no-contact order against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing alleges that Epstein's associate and recruiter, Hayley Robson, has been harassing victims Jane Does 4 and 7 through text messages and in-person threats while claiming to be financially supported by and cooperating with Epstein. The plaintiffs request a court order prohibiting Epstein from any direct or indirect contact with the victims.

Legal filing (notice of joinder in motion for no-contact order)
2025-12-26

045.pdf

This document is a 'Notice of Joinder' filed on June 8, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join a motion for a 'No-Contact Order' against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing alleges that Epstein's associate, Hayley Robson (who originally recruited the victims), has been harassing Jane Does 4 and 7 via text messages and in-person threats while claiming to be financially supported by Epstein. The plaintiffs argue that a court order is necessary to prevent Epstein from contacting or harassing victims through third parties like Robson.

Legal filing (notice of joinder in motion for no-contact order)
2025-12-26

EFTA00014110.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter alleges that Epstein's participation in a work release program constitutes a material breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement, which required incarceration without community control. The U.S. Attorney demands Epstein withdraw from the program and complete his eighteen-month term of imprisonment as agreed.

Legal correspondence / letter
2025-12-25

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017973.jpg

This document is a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377) describing Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 work release conditions. It details how Epstein paid Palm Beach Sheriff's deputies to monitor him while he spent up to 12 hours a day at his office, where he met with male and female visitors behind closed doors without deputy supervision. The article notes that visitor logs from this time were kept in a safe but no longer exist, and highlights how deputies began referring to him as a 'client' rather than an 'inmate'.

News article (miami herald) / court exhibit / house oversight document
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Housing Costs

From: Judge Pucillo
To: Belohlavek

Questioning why taxpayers are paying for 18 months of housing instead of DOC.

Court dialogue
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity