COURT
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-26 | N/A | Multiple court rulings and filings occurred on the Wednesday preceding the newsletter date. | Various Courts (New York, S... | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | U.S. Tax Court decision in Californians Helping to Alleviate Medical Problems, Inc. v. Commission... | United States | View |
050.pdf
Legal correspondence filed on April 15, 2021, in the case of United States v. Noel and Thomas (the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's death). Assistant US Attorneys Lonergan and Roos inform Judge Torres of trial availability dates for the defendants in late 2021 and request an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act.
EFTA00032025.pdf
An email from Deputy Clerk Kathleen DuPont dated July 2, 2020, providing procedural instructions for a video conference regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's removal hearing (20mj132-01). The email advises participants to keep their video hidden and audio muted unless called upon to speak.
EFTA00030441.pdf
This document is a draft protocol dated December 13, 2019, establishing the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It outlines the voluntary nature of the program, the independence of the Administrator (Jordana H. Feldman), eligibility criteria for claimants, and the process for evaluating claims and issuing compensation without a financial cap. It explicitly states that the Estate has no control over the Administrator's decisions and details confidentiality waivers and release requirements for victims accepting compensation.
EFTA00029606.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
EFTA00028387.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 5, 2019, the day before Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. An Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York forwards an email they sent to Judge Moses containing a search warrant application for a 'New York Residence' (presumably Epstein's Manhattan mansion). The email notes the submission is happening during a court holiday (Independence Day weekend).
EFTA00025355.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between defense attorneys at Winston & Strawn and Assistant US Attorneys at the SDNY from July to September 2019. The correspondence concerns an investigation into a female client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), including scheduling meetings, discussing an attorney proffer, and the defense reporting threats made against the client's husband. A critical revelation in the text is the SDNY's assertion that they possess telephone records proving the client had numerous contacts with multiple underage girls.
EFTA00019992.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 27, 2019, regarding a request for a transcript related to Case No. 19-CR-490. This case number corresponds to the federal criminal indictment against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York. The email confirms the attachment of the requested case copy, though the identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00019892.pdf
A letter from Mark Anthony Taylor to Mel Stride (Chairman of the UK Treasury Select Committee) dated February 23, 2020. Taylor alleges that the TSC, FCA, and SFO are suppressing evidence regarding Jes Staley's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically referring to 'blackmail emails' held by the TSC. The letter also makes serious allegations regarding judicial corruption, the potential murder of a whistleblower friend in 2017, and accusations of pedophilia against high-ranking legal officials.
EFTA00019565.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
EFTA00015630.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 8-9, 2019, between attorney Raymond L. Colon and a redacted individual (likely a prosecutor or court official). The discussion centers on scheduling a plea hearing at the Magistrate's Court in room 5A for July 10, 2019, and exchanging a plea agreement. Notably, on July 8, Colon congratulates the recipient on a 'Job well done' regarding 'the Epstein case,' coinciding with Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
EFTA00011028.pdf
This document is the draft Protocol for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, dated December 13, 2019. It establishes the rules, eligibility criteria, and administration process for victims of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse to file claims and receive compensation from the Estate in exchange for a legal release. The protocol emphasizes the independence of the Administrator (Jordana H. Feldman) from the Estate and notes that there is no aggregate cap on compensation funds.
DOJ-OGR-00000569.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 24, 2019, where a speaker identified as Mr. Weinberg argues against the imposition of monetary bail conditions. He supports his position by referencing the federal Bail Reform Act of 1984, a similar movement in Massachusetts, and a broader societal shift away from the overcriminalization policies of the 1980s. Weinberg contends that defendants should not be incarcerated simply because they are unable to pay bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000478.jpg
This document page details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein on charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and sex trafficking of minors, citing specific statutes and quoting the indictment regarding his recruitment methods and locations in New York and Florida. It also notes his arraignment before Judge Henry Pittman and outlines legal principles for detention under the Bail Reform Act.
DOJ-OGR-00021057.jpg
This document is page 'ix' from a legal filing, specifically Document 59 in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous U.S. court cases with their legal citations and corresponding page references within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1926 to 2017 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002114.jpg
This document is the Curriculum Vitae of David Perry QC, a prominent UK barrister specializing in extradition law. It outlines his extensive career, including roles as Treasury Counsel and a judge, and highlights his expertise in extradition matters. A key event detailed is his co-authorship of a major 2011 independent review for the UK Home Office on the nation's extradition arrangements, which concluded that the 2003 UK-US treaty was fair and did not need renegotiation.
DOJ-OGR-00010129.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 522, filed April 6, 2012) discussing legal ethics, specifically the standard of knowledge required for an attorney to report fraud or perjury to a tribunal. It cites a case involving an attorney named 'Doe' where discipline was reversed because 'actual knowledge' of perjury is required, not just strong suspicion. The author of this document identifies themselves in a footnote as the expert witness who testified for Doe in the underlying Connecticut disciplinary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00009451.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal memorandum or expert report (filed as part of court proceedings in 2012 and re-filed in 2022) analyzing the ethical obligations of defense lawyers. It cites case law regarding the 'adversary system' and specifically questions whether lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard LLP violated ethical duties by failing to disclose information prior to a letter sent to the Court on July 21, 2011. The text discusses the balance between client confidentiality and the duty of candor to the tribunal.
DOJ-OGR-00009450.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (originally 2012, refiled 2022) discussing attorney ethics regarding the reporting of perjury (fraud on the tribunal). It cites a precedent case involving 'Doe,' arguing that an attorney must have actual knowledge, not just strong suspicion, of perjury before a duty to disclose arises. The author of this text notes in a footnote that they served as the expert witness for 'Doe' in a Connecticut disciplinary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00002954.jpg
This document is page 'xix' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities listing various United States court cases, from Nitsche to Quinones, along with their legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1974 to 2018 and originate from several federal courts, including district courts, circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court.
DOJ-OGR-00004869.jpg
This is page 57 of a legal filing (Document 310-1) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text presents legal arguments citing various precedents (including Martinez, Carrillo, and Baird) to establish that non-prosecution agreements should be treated as binding contracts similar to plea agreements. This argument is likely being used to support the defense's claim regarding the applicability of the 2007 Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004814.jpg
This document is a page from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (Commonwealth v. Cosby) written by Justice Wecht, decided on June 30, 2021. While the text concerns the prosecution of Bill Cosby and District Attorney Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute due to lack of evidence, the header indicates this document was filed as an exhibit (Document 310-1) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the federal criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Cosby case was likely cited in the Maxwell proceedings as a legal precedent regarding the validity of non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00002854.jpg
This page from a legal filing outlines conspiracy charges against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein involving the enticement of minors for sexual activity in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422. It specifically details 'Overt Acts' committed between 1994 and 1997 involving a 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019806.jpg
This document is a page of endnotes (p. 318) from a book authored by Edward Jay Epstein, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets'. The notes provide citations for Chapter 14, 'The Crime Scene Investigation,' detailing sources related to Edward Snowden, the NSA, James Clapper, and comparisons to Lee Harvey Oswald. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019806', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019270.jpg
This page appears to be page 36 of a report titled 'Breaking Down Democracy,' stamped with a House Oversight file number (019270). The text analyzes the political strategy of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his party, Fidesz, detailing their dismantling of democratic checks and balances, control of the media, and establishment of 'crony capitalism' since 2010. It specifically notes that despite criticism in Europe, Orbán found support among U.S. conservatives, referencing a 2015 congressional hearing in Washington.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity