This document is an email dated July 12, 2019, sent from an iPhone. The sender shares a link to a CNN article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein allegedly hired private investigators to stalk his victims'. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
An internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 8, 2019. Two officials discuss putting a 'forfeiture case' involving Epstein on their radar, indicating asset seizure investigations were active or being considered months prior to his July 2019 arrest.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.
This document is a page from a book or scientific manuscript (Chapter 22: 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?') discussing computer chip architecture, specifically the challenges of heat dissipation in 3D chips compared to the efficiency of the human brain. It references Intel's 2004 developments and iPhone CPU architecture. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015712' indicates this page is part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of or interest in scientific research, though no specific individuals are named on this page.
This document appears to be a House Oversight clipping or research file (Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032083) compiling news articles regarding GTX Corp. The articles detail the company's GPS tracking technology, specifically a deal with Samsung for mobile apps and the release of a GPS-embedded shoe for Alzheimer's patients in partnership with Aetrex. The document lists key personnel including CEO Patrick Bertagna and journalists covering the tech.
This document appears to be a printout of a marketing article or webpage discussing GPS tracking technology provided by a company called LOCiMOBILE. It highlights the installation of their apps on 850,000 smartphones, announces an iPad version for $4.99, and cites a Juniper Research report projecting location-based service revenues to reach $12.7 billion by 2014. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a productivity book or article (content strongly resembles Timothy Ferriss's 'The 4-Hour Workweek') discussing time management strategies such as batching activities and setting autonomous rules for employees. It promotes the software tool Evernote for eliminating paper clutter and organizing information. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013865' stamp, indicating it was included in a document production for a congressional investigation, likely as an attachment or file found on a subject's device.
An email chain from March 9, 2016, primarily between Philip Kafka and Terry Kafka (President of Impact Outdoor Advertising Co.), with Janet Kafka cc'd. The discussion focuses on the 2016 US Presidential election, specifically regarding Newt Gingrich's view of Donald Trump. Both participants express support for Trump, with Philip noting he sways voters by positioning Trump and Sanders as anti-establishment, while Terry describes Trump as a 'problem solver.'
An email chain from April 13, 2019, ending with Jeffrey Epstein (using alias 'J') emailing Alan Dershowitz with the comment 'wow'. The thread contains a forwarded dispute where an unidentified individual confronts another about a false rumor that they had asked Donald Trump for a million dollars. The accuser/reporter eventually retracts or clarifies they were 'just reporting what I heard' after the subject vehemently denies the allegation.
This document, from a House Oversight collection, displays two separate email communications from May 10, 2017, involving Barclays' then-CEO Jes Staley. The first is a legitimate exchange where Staley thanks Chairman John McFarlane for his support; the second is a noted 'Prankster's email' sent to Staley by an impersonator of McFarlane, containing provocative language like 'who should we seek to silence next!?'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity