| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Hillary Clinton
|
Investigator subject |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Investigator subject antagonistic |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Investigator subject |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew McCabe
|
Professional conspiratorial alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Investigator subject adversarial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-10 | N/A | Removal of Peter Strzok from the special counsel investigation. | FBI | View |
An email thread from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Robert Mueller investigation, with Schoen offering harsh criticisms of prosecutors Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, while Epstein compares the bias of FBI agent Peter Strzok to mob prosecutors. Schoen also mentions media coverage tying Epstein to Donald Trump and the #MeToo movement, expressing regret that he was not chosen to help Epstein with his legal defense.
An email chain from July 4, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation) and attorney David Schoen. They discuss the Mueller investigation, specifically criticizing Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, and Andrew Weissmann for alleged political bias and misconduct. Schoen provides a detailed anecdote accusing Weissmann of unethical behavior in the EDNY.
This document is an opinion article by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley, dated June 22, 2018, discussing the legal implications of alleged anti-Trump bias within the FBI on Robert Mueller's investigation. It cites Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report, highlighting specific instances of bias by FBI officials like Peter Strzok and the handling of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation versus the Clinton email probe. The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of a congressional discovery batch.
This document describes findings by Inspector General Horowitz regarding anti-Trump bias among FBI officials during the 2016 election cycle, specifically within the Crossfire Hurricane and Clinton email investigations. It details concerning communications from agents like Peter Strzok and questions whether bias influenced the prioritization of the Russia inquiry over the Clinton email probe.
This document is an opinion article by Elizabeth Price Foley from June 22, 2018, presented as evidence to a House Oversight investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026281). The author argues that the Special Counsel's investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was tainted by political bias within the FBI, citing Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on anti-Trump text messages and actions by officials like Peter Strzok. The document makes no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or events.
This document, labeled for House Oversight, analyzes an Inspector General's report concerning FBI conduct during the 2016 election. It details findings of significant anti-Trump bias among key officials like Peter Strzok, suggesting this animus influenced decisions like prioritizing the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation over probing Hillary Clinton's emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop. Notably, this document is about the 2016 election investigations and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Strzok's text messages 'created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.' Most of these messages pertained to the Russia investigation.
In response to a colleague's fear that Trump would become president, Strzok said: 'No he won't. We'll stop it.'
In response to a colleague's fear that Trump would become president, Strzok said: 'No he won't. We'll stop it.'
In response to a colleague's fear that Trump would become president, Strzok said: 'No he won't. We'll stop it.'
Strzok assuaged a colleague's fear that Trump would become president by stating, 'No he won’t. We’ll stop it.'
Strzok's text messages 'created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.' Most of these messages pertained to the Russia investigation.
Strzok assuaged a colleague's fear that Trump would become president by stating, 'No he won’t. We’ll stop it.'
No he won’t. We’ll stop it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity