This document, marked as a House Oversight record, draws parallels between private military contractor Erik Prince (Blackwater) and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets. It details the controversial legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein by Ken Starr and others, specifically highlighting the sweeping immunity granted by the Southern District of Florida non-prosecution agreement. The text explicitly suggests Epstein's light sentence is best explained by the use of children for 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail.'
This document outlines Kenneth Starr's legal defense of Blackwater regarding the 2004 Fallujah Ambush and his role in securing a non-prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. It draws parallels between intelligence assets like Erik Prince and Bin Laden, suggesting government complicity in using such figures for operations outside standard political restrictions.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight investigation file (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015012) containing research notes or a draft report. It juxtaposes the operations of private military contractor Blackwater (Erik Prince) with the legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting a theme of government complicity or utilization of 'assets' for illicit purposes. The text specifically alleges that Epstein's lenient sentence and non-prosecution agreement were related to 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail' and draws parallels between Erik Prince and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity