Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00032047.pdf
This document is an email chain between the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York and Virgin Islands properties. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including massive data volumes (terabytes), compatibility issues between forensic tools and the Relativity review platform, and delays caused by COVID-19 and FBI network upgrades. Key discussions involve the identification of specific devices (servers, laptops, hard drives), the urgency of discovery for potential additional charges, and the logistics of physically transferring hard drives containing evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022310.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, containing a legal argument against a new National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule. The author contends that the NLRB exceeded its statutory authority by mandating that employers post a notice of employee rights, arguing that Congress did not delegate this specific 'gap-filling' power and that failure to post does not constitute an 'unfair labor practice' under the existing framework of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The document cites numerous court cases and legislative history to support the position that the NLRB's rule is an overreach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022281.jpg
This document from the Federal Register discusses the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) statutory authority to issue a rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board refutes arguments that a high standard of "necessity" or "grave and immediate danger" is required, citing legal precedents like Chevron and AHA to justify its rulemaking power. The text concludes that the notice-posting rule is a legitimate exercise of authority because effective enforcement of the NLRA depends on employees being aware of their rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022279.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) legal justification for its rulemaking authority under the NLRA. It refutes comments from organizations opposing a proposed rule by citing numerous Supreme Court precedents that affirm broad rulemaking powers for federal agencies. This document is purely a legal and administrative text and contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity