Valerio
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00033638.pdf
This document is a Daily Activity Report for MCC New York dated July 23, 2019, covering events from July 22, 2019. It details operational issues including a gang threat ('Macballers') on the 11-South unit, the failure of fire alarms and sprinkler systems requiring a 'Fire Watch,' and significant staffing shortages. The report also lists inmate movements, specifically admissions to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) and releases from the facility, along with staffing overtime and leave statistics showing 9 staff members AWOL.
DOJ-OGR-00000338.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a prosecution filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecution asserts that the defendant's wealth should not permit him to create a private, guard-monitored home confinement, citing legal precedent. It further argues the defendant poses an ongoing danger to the community, referencing a prior conviction for a sex crime with a minor and the discovery of a large collection of sexually suggestive photographs of underage females at his residence.
DOJ-OGR-00000337.jpg
This legal document, page 9 of a court filing, argues against a defendant's proposal to hire private security guards as an alternative to pretrial detention. It cites numerous legal precedents from the Second Circuit and other district courts to assert that such arrangements create a conflict of interest, magnify flight risks, and foster unequal treatment based on wealth, which is contrary to the principles of the Bail Reform Act. The document highlights past cases where wealthy defendants on private security details violated the terms of their release.
DOJ-OGR-00000336.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 12, 2019, is a memorandum arguing against a defendant's proposal for bail involving home confinement, electronic monitoring, and a private security force. The prosecution contends that these measures are insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court, citing numerous legal precedents that question the security, fairness, and practicality of such "private jail" arrangements. The document asserts that a private security firm cannot replicate the controlled environment of a federal facility and that allowing wealthy defendants to fund their own detention is legally problematic.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity