Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-07 | Court ruling | The court granted the petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the panel’s opinion. | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-04-14 | Court ruling | A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied Wild's petition for a wri... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002539.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the timeline of events following the Miami Herald's 2018 reporting and Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death. It covers the dismissal of the indictment against Epstein due to his suicide, the ongoing CVRA litigation by victims (specifically Jane Doe 1) in the 11th Circuit regarding the government's failure to confer with victims before the NPA, and the initiation of the OPR investigation requested by Senator Ben Sasse.
DOJ-OGR-00021447.jpg
This legal document details a court case involving a petitioner, Ms. Wild, and the U.S. government concerning the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA). The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals initially denied Wild's petition, but was highly critical of the government's lack of transparency and 'active misrepresentation'. The court later vacated its own opinion and granted a rehearing en banc, with a new oral argument scheduled.
DOJ-OGR-00021181.jpg
This legal document outlines the events following Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, including the dismissal of his federal indictment in New York and the progression of a Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) lawsuit in Florida. It details a specific victim's appeal and the government's arguments. The document also describes the initiation of an investigation by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) into potential prosecutorial misconduct, prompted by a Miami Herald report and a formal request from Senator Ben Sasse.
DOJ-OGR-00003183.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the timeline following Jeffrey Epstein's August 2019 suicide, including the dismissal of his indictment in SDNY and the conclusion of CVRA litigation in Florida where the court found the government had not litigated in bad faith but had violated the CVRA. It summarizes the appellate history of 'Jane Doe 1' seeking a writ of mandamus in the 11th Circuit regarding the non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Additionally, it marks the initiation of the OPR investigation into DOJ attorney misconduct, triggered by a request from Senator Ben Sasse following the Miami Herald's November 2018 reporting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein against federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The text argues that the prosecution lacks evidence of 'inducement' or 'enticement' occurring over the phone or internet, noting that communications were often handled by secretaries and did not contain explicit content. The defense claims the women involved ('masseuses') were 'friends of friends' who visited Epstein's home voluntarily, often without direct prior contact with Epstein himself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012147.jpg
This is page 6 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP, defending Jeffrey Epstein. The document argues that Epstein's conduct does not violate federal statutes 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b), or 2423(b), specifically focusing on § 2422(b) (coercion/enticement). The defense asserts that because Epstein's assistants made the phone calls to schedule massages without discussing sexual acts or possessing criminal intent at the time of the call, the 'interstate facility' element of the federal crime is not met.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity