AUSAs
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00038840.pdf
This document is an email chain from August to October 2021 between a Detective on the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and an FBI Special Agent in the Denver Division. They discuss the logistics of transferring evidence, specifically a 'thumb drive' and 'boots.' In October 2021, the NY Detective requests the boots be returned urgently because Assistant US Attorneys (AUSAs) need to mark them as exhibits, likely for the upcoming Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00031256.pdf
An internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the opening of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in November 2021. The primary email, sent to criminal prosecutors and investigators, rallies the team, contrasts the SDNY's resolve with Florida prosecutors (referencing the earlier Epstein case), and provides logistical details for attending the opening statements at the courthouse. Colleagues respond with support and commitment to the 'battle' for truth.
EFTA00031251.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) sent on November 28, 2021, the day before the opening statements in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email serves as a morale booster for the prosecution team, explicitly contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute 1994 crimes with prosecutors in Florida (a reference to the Epstein plea deal). It provides logistical details for staff wishing to attend the opening at the courthouse at 40 Foley Square.
EFTA00031250.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York sent on November 28, 2021, rallying colleagues before the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The email contrasts the SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical crimes with prosecutors in Florida, asserts that Maxwell sexually exploited underage girls, and provides logistical details for staff wishing to attend the opening statements at 40 Foley Square.
EFTA00029424.pdf
An email chain between Assistant US Attorneys at the SDNY on the eve of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial opening statements (November 28, 2021). The emails contain motivational rhetoric contrasting SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical crimes with Florida prosecutors, logistical details for the trial at 40 Foley Square, and expressions of support for the prosecution team.
EFTA00029418.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 28, 2021, among Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The primary email announces the opening statements for the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* scheduled for the following morning. The email includes logistical details about courtroom assignments and a strong statement distinguishing the SDNY's commitment to justice from Florida prosecutors (likely referencing the 2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement), emphasizing the intent to hold Maxwell accountable for sexually exploiting underage girls in 1994.
EFTA00023055.pdf
This FBI Electronic Communication dated December 6, 2006, outlines the priority investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for child prostitution (Case ID 31E-MM-108062). The report details cooperation with the Palm Beach Police Department and notes that during a previous PBPD search warrant, Epstein's computer CPUs had been removed from the home and were never recovered, though incriminating message pads regarding 'girls' were found. The FBI is requesting assistance from Albuquerque, San Juan, and St. Thomas offices to establish interstate commerce violations, citing a target indictment date of January 2007 due to 'political influences' and victim vulnerability.
EFTA00023013.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between government officials (likely Bureau of Prisons) attempting to locate the 'official/final suicide reconstruction report' for Jeffrey Epstein. The search was prompted by requests from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Assistant US Attorneys (AUSAs). The correspondence indicates the report was believed to be at the 'Central Office' but had not been issued out, and a specific timeline for its release could not be provided at that time.
EFTA00019215.pdf
An internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated November 28, 2021, preparing staff for the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial the following morning. The email contrasts the SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical sex crimes with prosecutors in Florida and provides logistical details for staff wishing to attend the proceedings at the courthouse.
EFTA00015659.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ email chain from November 28, 2021, the day before opening statements in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. A senior prosecutor (Assistant US Attorney) sends a motivational email to SDNY staff contrasting their willingness to prosecute historical sex crimes with prosecutors in Florida, outlining the logistics for the trial (courtrooms, overflow rooms), and stating that Maxwell exploited underage girls. Subsequent emails in the chain involve staff coordinating attendance and seat reservations for the opening arguments.
EFTA00014899.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ email chain from November 2021 regarding the opening of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. An Assistant US Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) announces the trial schedule and logistics (courtroom 40 Foley, room 318) to colleagues. The email notably criticizes Florida prosecutors (likely referencing the earlier Epstein plea deal) for being afraid to prosecute historical sex crimes from 1994, contrasting them with the SDNY's resolve to hold Maxwell accountable for sexually exploiting underage girls.
DOJ-OGR-00001871.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, is being subjected to "draconian" and punitive pretrial detention conditions. The letter posits that these harsh measures are not related to Maxwell's own conduct but are a direct result of the government's attempt to repair its reputation following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody. The attorney details failed attempts to resolve these issues through internal prison channels and claims the conditions are impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her legal defense.
DOJ-OGR-00021836.jpg
This legal document, dated November 1, 2024, presents an argument for an en banc review to potentially overrule or limit the 'Annabi' canon of construction for plea agreements. The text discusses the jurisdictional authority of U.S. Attorneys' offices, citing the U.S. Attorneys' Manual and the Judiciary Act of 1789 to argue about the scope of immunity and the government's obligation to be explicit about its limitations. The argument is framed in the context of a past case involving interviews with Epstein's lawyers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity