Juror Number 50
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Todd Spodek
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
retained counsel for Juror Number 50
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Trial participant |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed for Juror 50 | Court | View |
| 2021-11-04 | Signing of a legal document | Juror Number 50 signed a declaration under penalty of perjury, affirming the truthfulness of thei... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-04 | Signing of a legal document | Juror Number 50 signed a declaration under penalty of perjury for a Jury Questionnaire. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020709.jpg
This document contains a series of docket entries from January 2022 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily concern 'Juror Number 50,' who retained private counsel (Todd Spodek) regarding a potential post-trial inquiry into juror misconduct or eligibility. Judge Nathan issued orders managing the scheduling of motions, addressing the juror's request to intervene, and handling the sealing and redaction of the juror's questionnaire and voir dire records.
DOJ-OGR-00020564.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2022 detailing post-trial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It focuses heavily on 'Juror Number 50' (Juror 50), who retained private counsel (Todd Spodek) amid discussions of a potential new trial based on juror issues. Judge Nathan issued several orders scheduling briefings on whether a juror inquiry is required and temporarily sealing Juror 50's motion to intervene.
DOJ-OGR-00020463.jpg
This document is a docket sheet segment from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from January 5, 2022, to January 14, 2022. It details judicial orders regarding post-trial motions, specifically focusing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror Number 50, the appointment of counsel for said juror, and scheduling for related briefings. The document records Judge Alison J. Nathan's decisions to manage the inquiry into the juror's statements and the handling of related motions under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00009093.jpg
This document is the declaration page from a jury questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. On November 4, 2021, Juror Number 50 signed the declaration, affirming under penalty of perjury that their answers were truthful and completed without outside assistance. The document was officially filed with the court on February 24, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00009784.jpg
This document is a declaration page from a Jury Questionnaire for Case 20-cr-00038-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. On November 4, 2021, Juror Number 50 signed the declaration, affirming under penalty of perjury that their answers were truthful and completed without assistance or discussion with others.
DOJ-OGR-00009686.jpg
This document is the declaration page from a Jury Questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. On November 4, 2021, Juror Number 50 signed the document, declaring under penalty of perjury that their answers were truthful and completed without assistance. The document was officially filed with the court on March 9, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00008810.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell on January 5, 2022. The order states that because Juror Number 50 has secured their own legal representation ("retained counsel"), the court will not appoint CJA (Criminal Justice Act) counsel for them. The juror's counsel is directed to review a previous docket entry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity