Woodrow Wilson Center Kissinger Institute on China and the United States

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
4
Events
3
Documents
4
Also known as:
Kissinger

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Anastasya Lloyd-Damnjanovic
Authored report for
5
1
View
person Tom
Professional political
5
1
View
person George Shultz
Co authors
5
1
View
person George Shultz
Business associate
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2018-07-31 N/A Meeting between 'Tom' and Kissinger regarding China Unknown View
2008-01-15 N/A Publication of a second Wall Street Journal article by the same authors. USA View
2007-01-01 N/A Publication of a Wall Street Journal article regarding nuclear fuel controls. USA View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027372.jpg

This document is a digital message log from July 31, 2018, originating from a House Oversight investigation. It details a conversation between the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted sender. The discussion involves arranging a private dinner and discusses a third party named 'Tom' who shares the recipient's views on China and is preparing to meet with Kissinger.

Digital communication log (message export)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023496.jpg

This document page, stamped as House Oversight evidence, discusses nuclear non-proliferation policy and the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty). It critiques a 2007 Wall Street Journal article written by Shultz, Kissinger, Perry, and Nunn for promoting a 'utopian' vision of a nuclear-free world, comparing the momentum to the Soviet-manipulated 'nuclear freeze' movement against Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. While stamped with a House Oversight code often associated with larger investigations, the text itself deals strictly with geopolitical nuclear policy and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.

House oversight committee evidence (page from a book or policy report)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023495.jpg

This document appears to be page 9 of a policy paper or article analyzing nuclear non-proliferation strategies. It discusses the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, criticizes the 'Atoms for Peace' initiative from the Eisenhower era, and highlights the unintended consequences of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), citing India's nuclear development via Canadian assistance as an example. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a Congressional investigation production.

Policy analysis / report page (evidentiary document)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025736.jpg

This document is a forensic log of text messages from August 25, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They are brainstorming individuals who might have influence over an unnamed third party (likely Donald Trump given the context of 2018 and the names mentioned). The conversation dismisses Tom Barrack because he allegedly 'called him crazy' and is 'in the dog house,' and Epstein also dismisses Rick Gates as 'Bad'.

Forensic message log / investigative document (house oversight)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
1
Total
1

A Preliminary Study of PRC Political Influence and Interf...

From: Anastasya Lloyd-Damnja...
To: Woodrow Wilson Center ...

A study on People's Republic of China (PRC) political influence in American higher education.

Report
2018-09-06

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity