| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1962-01-01 | N/A | Oral argument for the appeal of Daniel Jackson Oliver Wendell Holmes Morgan. | Court (District of Columbia) | View |
This document is a page from the Curriculum Vitae of legal ethics professor Stephen Gillers, listed as 'Page 13 of 29' in a 2012 court filing and 'Page 40 of 117' in a 2022 filing. It lists his academic publications and articles ranging from 1999 to 2011, focusing on legal ethics, settlement agreements, and attorney conduct. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, indicating it was processed by the Department of Justice Office of Government Relations.
This document appears to be page 55 of a manuscript or memoir draft by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It recounts his experiences as a law clerk in 1962-1963, specifically detailing a case involving a fraudulent lawyer named Morgan and Dershowitz's admiration for the appellate attorney Monroe Freedman. The text highlights a lesson Dershowitz learned from Judge Bazelon regarding the necessity of a solid legal basis for reversing convictions, ending with a parenthetical reference to Bush v. Gore.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity