This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) discussing federalism, prosecutorial discretion, and the expansion of federal law enforcement (including the FBI) to address local corruption and bias. The footnotes provide a comparative legal analysis, citing German laws (StPO) regarding the mandatory duty to prosecute crimes, contrasting it with discretionary powers. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531' and bears the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney), suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission regarding arguments about prosecutorial oversight or misconduct.
This document is a page from a legal analysis or journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) included in a House Oversight production, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen. It argues for the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) during the investigation phase, before formal charges are filed, critiquing the DOJ/OLC position to the contrary. The text specifically cites the "Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case" as a primary example of why victim participation is necessary before charges are filed.
This document is page 63 of a 2014 legal academic publication discussing Crime Victims' Rights. It argues for victim participation during criminal investigations, explicitly citing the 'Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case' as a primary example of why victims need rights before charges are filed. The text also provides historical context regarding the victims' rights movement, referencing the Warren Court and President Reagan's Task Force on Victims of Crime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity