| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
This is a legal motion filed on December 14, 2015, in the Supreme Court of Florida (Case No. SC15-2286) by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. Epstein requests an extension of time until January 19, 2016, to file his initial brief on jurisdiction. The document notes that the Respondent's counsel, Philip M. Burlington, has no objection to the request, and includes a service list of attorneys involved in the related proceedings.
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
This document contains an email chain between a partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (SDNY/FBI) from late 2018/early 2019. The correspondence outlines preparations for a new investigation or prosecution, including requests for victim lists beyond those in the original Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Crucially, it provides a comprehensive list of lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein, his pilots, staff, and Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Bruce Reinhart (now a magistrate judge) represented the pilots and staff.
This document is a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Fred Haddad, Tonja Haddad Coleman) regarding a media inquiry from Sharon Churcher of The Mail on Sunday. The journalist is requesting comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards, specifically regarding a witness who intends to testify that Epstein flew her to London to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 for $15,000. The internal responses between Epstein and his lawyers are redacted as privileged.
An email chain from October 2013 involving Darren Indyke, Fred Haddad, and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). The chain discusses a high-priority request for comment from 'The Mail on Sunday' regarding a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards. The journalist's email outlines allegations that Epstein flew a 17-year-old girl (name redacted) to London to have sex with Prince Andrew for $15,000.
This document is an email chain from October 2013 involving Jeffrey Epstein's legal team discussing a media inquiry from The Mail on Sunday. The journalist, Sharon Churcher, requests comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards, citing specific allegations that a witness was trafficked by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew in London for $15,000 while underage. The inquiry also mentions allegations that Epstein flew young women to entertain President Clinton.
This document is the final page (Page 9) of a legal letter dated September 12, 2013, written by attorney Jack Scarola. The text argues against the use of 'litigation privilege' to hide a 'life of perversion' and states that 'Epstein’s day of public reckoning is inevitable.' The letter references an upcoming mediation and copies several attorneys involved in the Epstein legal cases, including Bradley Edwards and Jack Goldberger.
Privileged/Redacted response regarding the press inquiry.
Privileged - Redacted body.
Privileged - Redacted
Privileged - Redacted body.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity