circuit court
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Petition | A sexual offender petitions the court to remove the requirement for registration. | the circuit in which the se... | View |
063.pdf
This document is a court filing from the Circuit Court - Criminal Division in Palm Beach County, Florida, for case number 2008CF 009381, State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. It is a request filed on September 3, 2009, to add a 'ST Check Re: opinion' (likely Status Check) to the calendar for September 4, 2009, at 11:00 AM.
049.pdf
A court disposition form from the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein case (No. 502008CF009381AXXXMB) dated June 26, 2009. The hearing addressed a 'Motion to stay' which was denied by Judge Colbath, with a written order to follow. Handwritten notes indicate that documents are delayed until July 2, 2009, and a motion to compel the defendant to post bond was denied; attorney Brad Edwards was present representing a redacted party.
014.pdf
This document is a plea agreement and sentencing order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated June 30, 2008. Jeffrey Epstein pleads guilty to Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, receiving a sentence of 18 months in county detention followed by 12 months of community control. The order specifies strict conditions including house arrest at 358 El Brillo Way, sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and a work-release arrangement allowing him to work at the 'Florida Science Foundation' in West Palm Beach.
007-01.pdf
This document is a 'Custodial Parent Modification' agreement and subsequent court order from 2006 between Dawn Lavogue-Sandberg and her former husband (name redacted, but signature matches Jeffrey Epstein). The agreement grants full parental custody of their two minor children to the Former Husband, who resides in Florida, while the Former Wife resides in Georgia. The Former Husband assumes all financial responsibility for the children, including medical care and college tuition.
EFTA00013976.pdf
This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.
EFTA00013890.pdf
This document is a 'Plea in the Circuit Court' for Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated June 27, 2008. Epstein pled guilty to Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, receiving a sentence of 12 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility followed by 18 months of Community Control. The document includes extensive attachments detailing the statutory terms and conditions for community control and the requirements for sexual offender registration under Florida law.
EFTA00010496.pdf
This document is a 'Plea in the Circuit Court' recording Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. It outlines a sentence of 18 months total confinement in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility followed by 12 months of community control. The document includes extensive attachments of Florida Statutes (948.101 and 943.0435) detailing the specific legal requirements for community control and mandatory sexual offender registration.
DOJ-OGR-00000493.jpg
This document is page 22 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The court finds Epstein to be a flight risk based on factors including extensive foreign travel, international financial ties, unexplained assets, and his criminal history. The text also outlines the severity of the charges against him, specifically the sexual abuse of minors in New York and Palm Beach, allegedly facilitated by employees and associates.
DOJ-OGR-00030380.jpg
This legal document details the specific criteria and judicial process for a sexual offender to petition for removal from a lifetime registration requirement. It stipulates conditions such as a 25-year period without arrest post-release for certain offenses and compliance with the federal Adam Walsh Act. The procedure involves petitioning a circuit court, notifying the state attorney who may oppose the request, and ultimately providing a certified court order to the registering department to have the classification removed.
DOJ-OGR-00005417.jpg
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Document 380) from October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text is a legal argument citing multiple precedents (Boyle, Rodriguez, Hill, Watts, Carneglia) to support the exclusion of evidence related to the government's charging decisions. The argument asserts that such evidence is hearsay, irrelevant, and potentially confusing to jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00005192.jpg
Handwritten legal notes analyzing the scope of Section 3283's "offense involving" language, discussing its application to repealed offenses and specific statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 113(a) and Chapter 109A. The text cites case law including United States v. Johnson, Miller v. United States, and United States v. Kepler to explore jurisdictional limits and the definition of conduct involving abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017762.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 48 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It outlines proposed changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 48 and 50, arguing that courts must consider victims' views before dismissing charges and ensure proceedings are free from unreasonable delay. The document bears the name David Schoen at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or testimony during a congressional investigation, likely related to the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016625.jpg
This page contains minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting dated July 17, 2008, detailing a legal dispute between 'The Town' (likely Palm Beach) and Dr. Lynn regarding his dog, Duke. The Town, represented by Mr. Randolph and Sgt. Krauel, seeks to have the dog removed or euthanized following a June 20th incident involving Laura Klein, while Dr. Lynn's attorney, Mr. Merola, argues regarding jurisdictional issues and compliance with ordinances 10-45 and 10-6. The document references parallel litigation in Circuit Court before Judge Hoy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010505.jpg
This document is a page from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich') contained within House Oversight files. It details the background of State Attorney Barry Krischer, specifically focusing on sexual harassment allegations filed against him in 1992 by his former secretary, Jodi Bergeron, which were dismissed. The text juxtaposes Krischer's legal troubles with Chief Reiter's investigations into both Rush Limbaugh and Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning potential felony charges and a case titled 'B.B. vs. Epstein'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011972.jpg
This document is a legal filing (Information) from the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in Miami-Dade County, Florida, dated Fall Term 2000. It charges Nadia Marcovic (likely Nadia Marcinkova) with two counts: Grand Theft First Degree ($100,000 or more) and Organized Fraud ($50,000 or more). The prosecution is brought by State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011913.jpg
This document is page 2 of a civil complaint filed by Jean-Luc Brunel and his agency, MC2 Model & Talent Miami, against Jeffrey Epstein. Brunel alleges that his business suffered tremendous losses and reputational damage due to false media stories linking him and his agency to Epstein following Epstein's 2006 sexual misconduct charges and subsequent conviction. The text establishes that Brunel and Epstein have known each other since MC2's inception in 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021748.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke in 2019 (based on copyright), containing the text of a news article or report reviewing the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the courtroom exchange where prosecutor Belohlavek misled Judge Pucillo about victim notification and agreement with the plea deal. It also references Alex Acosta's defense of the deal, the Labor Department's statement, and attorney Bradley Edwards' assertion that prosecutor Villafaña was directed by superiors to keep victims uninformed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021738.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke (likely in 2019) containing the text of a news article reviewing the 2008 plea deal of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the failure to inform victims about the plea agreement, citing court transcripts between Judge Pucillo and prosecutor Belohlavek, and includes comments from victim attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting prosecutors were directed by superiors to settle. The document includes Indyke's signature block with contact details redacted and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity