| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Pete Strzok
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
strzok
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert M.A. Johnson
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A meeting where Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe allegedly discussed 'how best to stop Trump from b... | McCabe's office | View |
| 2018-07-04 | N/A | An alleged meeting between Strzok and McCabe in McCabe's office to discuss 'how best to stop Trum... | McCabe's office | View |
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 32 of 78 in the production), produced by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legal and ethical arguments against 'ex parte' subpoenas, arguing they are unfair to victims and violate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have notice and the right to be heard before their confidential information is turned over to the defense, citing ABA standards and Supreme Court precedent.
This document is the first page of a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are insufficient to protect victims. The document was likely produced by attorney David Schoen (whose name appears in the footer) to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017636'. This is relevant to the Epstein case as the CVRA was the central statute invoked regarding the failure to notify victims of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
A printed webpage from The Palm Beach Post (dated 2011, article from 2009) detailing the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. The article highlights the tension between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, citing a 2006 letter where Reiter called the prosecutor's handling of the case 'highly unusual.' It also quotes attorneys discussing how Epstein's wealth allowed him to avoid federal prosecution through a 'back-room deal' involving high-profile lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr.
This document, an apparent news article or summary from around September 2018, analyzes the intense speculation and conflicting reports about whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had resigned or was about to be fired by President Trump. The chaos reportedly stemmed from news that Rosenstein had previously suggested recording Trump, with the article noting that Rosenstein's job status remained uncertain pending a scheduled meeting with the President.
This document is an email chain from July 4, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) and an unidentified correspondent. Their discussion covers political and legal topics, including the perceived media-seeking behavior of Alan Dershowitz, and allegations of political bias within the FBI, specifically regarding Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe's alleged efforts to prevent Donald Trump's presidency. The correspondent also references an unnamed person who they believe 'cut and run' in Epstein's legal case.
This document is an email chain from July 4, 2018, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and an unidentified correspondent. The correspondent refers to Alan Dershowitz as Epstein's 'friend' and heavily criticizes the Mueller investigation, accusing team member Andrew Weissmann of being a 'Pathological Liar' and alleging that officials Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe conspired to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. Epstein's reply discusses the nature of Strzok's testimony and questions about prosecutorial bias.
This document, a page from a U.S. House of Representatives report, details aspects of the FBI's counterintelligence investigation related to the Trump campaign. It notes that information on campaign advisor George Papadopoulos triggered the investigation in July 2016 but found no evidence of conspiracy between him and Carter Page. The memo focuses on the conduct of FBI agent Pete Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page, citing their anti-Trump bias in text messages, orchestration of media leaks, and a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an 'insurance policy' against Trump's election.
This document is a page from a U.S. House of Representatives oversight report detailing alleged misconduct by the FBI and DOJ regarding the Steele dossier. It claims officials concealed the dossier's unverified nature, the anti-Trump bias of its author, and related conflicts of interest from the FISC when obtaining a surveillance warrant. This document is related to the 2016 election investigation and contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity