| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondents |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed woman
|
Admirer subject of admiration |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Wife
|
Married |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Maskin, Eric
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed woman
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondents |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-01 | N/A | An unnamed woman gave a presentation at a conference at 9:30 AM, which was observed by Larry Summ... | Unspecified conference loca... | View |
| 2018-11-30 | N/A | A meeting between LHS (Larry Summers) and an unnamed woman in a hotel lobby. The woman declined t... | Hotel Lobby | View |
An email exchange from May 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Summers discussing the presidency of Donald Trump. Summers lists several criticisms of Trump, including potential Russian financial leverage and lack of intellect, while Epstein shares gossip that Trump's lawyer, Kaslowitz, is struggling to find firms willing to represent the President. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email chain from May 28, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Summers (LHS). They discuss the political landscape surrounding Donald Trump, including potential Russian collusion, family profiting, and legal representation difficulties involving Marc Kasowitz. Epstein advises Summers to connect with Bill Gates or Reid Hoffman regarding a donor-advised fund and to lead initiatives in education, genetics, and climate projects.
An email chain from May 28, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Summers (LHS) discussing the Trump administration. Summers asks Epstein for his take on Donald Trump's potential guilt regarding Russian collusion and other matters. Epstein replies that Trump is 'dumb,' will blame everyone else, and speculates on whether using WhatsApp constitutes obstruction of justice.
An email exchange between Larry Summers (LHS) and Jeffrey Epstein regarding the political and legal standing of Donald Trump in May 2017. Epstein notes that lawyer Kasowitz is struggling to find firms to assist in representing Trump. Summers provides a detailed list of his opinions on Trump's 'guilt' regarding temperament, family profiting, and Russian collusion, asking if Epstein agrees with his assessment.
This document is an email chain from February 9-10, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using jeevacation@gmail.com) and Larry Summers (LHS). They discuss the departures of high-level officials from the FBI and DOJ, including James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Rachel Brand. The emails mention 'page and strokz', a planned call from 'Lisa', and the political significance of the resignations.
This document is an email thread from November 30 to December 1, 2018, between Larry Summers (LHS) and an individual named 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com). Summers reflects on a recent awkward meeting with a woman with whom he had a past romantic relationship, deciding to limit their future contact to that of an 'economics mentor'. J's replies are brief, mentioning an 'option to purchase' and asking for 'results?'.
This document is an email thread from December 1, 2018, between Larry Summers (LHS) and an individual known as 'J'. The exchange details Summers' strong infatuation with a woman after her presentation at a conference, describing her as 'Gorgeous' and stating 'I'm fucked.' Summers also contemplates his actions in light of his marital status, while 'J' provides commentary on the situation.
This document is an email from Larry Summers to Eric Maskin dated September 11, 2018. Summers discusses the political implications of a proposal from a meeting that morning, weighing its potential effects on election outcomes with historical references to Nader, Bush, and Gore. He concludes by stating, 'Btw I gave them 10,000,' indicating a financial contribution to the group behind the proposal.
LHS states he sent a note asking a woman to text him after her 9:30 presentation. He debates whether he is 'thanking her or being sorry re my being married' and concludes it's the former.
J advises on how to frame the message to the woman: thanking her for her fortitude in a tough situation while acknowledging his own 'innate insensitivity'.
LHS describes the woman's conference performance as 'extremely good', calling her 'Smart', 'Assertive and clear', and 'Gorgeous.' He concludes with 'I'm fucked.'
J responds to LHS's 'I'm fucked' comment, joking that his 'debating tips obviously worked' and asks if his expression was memorable.
A one-word response: 'Yup'.
LHS states he sent a note asking a woman to text him after her 9:30 presentation. He debates whether he is 'thanking her or being sorry re my being married' and concludes it's the former.
J advises on how to frame the message to the woman: thanking her for her fortitude in a tough situation while acknowledging his own 'innate insensitivity'.
LHS describes the woman's conference performance as 'extremely good', calling her 'Smart', 'Assertive and clear', and 'Gorgeous.' He concludes with 'I'm fucked.'
J responds to LHS's 'I'm fucked' comment, joking that his 'debating tips obviously worked' and asks if his expression was memorable.
J advises on how to frame the message to the woman: thanking her for her fortitude in a tough situation while acknowledging his own 'innate insensitivity'.
LHS states he sent a note asking a woman to text him after her 9:30 presentation. He debates whether he is 'thanking her or being sorry re my being married' and concludes it's the former.
A one-word response: 'Yup'.
J responds to LHS's 'I'm fucked' comment, joking that his 'debating tips obviously worked' and asks if his expression was memorable.
LHS describes the woman's conference performance as 'extremely good', calling her 'Smart', 'Assertive and clear', and 'Gorgeous.' He concludes with 'I'm fucked.'
A one-word response: 'Yup'.
Larry Summers follows up with Eric Maskin after a morning meeting, discussing the political analysis of a proposal, possibly related to voting systems. He analyzes potential impacts on elections, referencing Nader, Bush, and Gore, and mentions that he gave 'them' (presumably the group behind the proposal) 10,000.
Confirming existence of studies and offering to find references.
Inquiry: 'Are there empirical studies on turnout.'
Eric Maskin responds to Larry Summers' question about empirical studies on turnout, stating he believes they exist and will try to find references.
Larry Summers asks Eric Maskin: "Are there empirical studies on turnout."
Eric Maskin responds to Larry Summers' question about empirical studies on turnout, stating he believes they exist and will try to find references.
Larry Summers asks Eric Maskin: "Are there empirical studies on turnout."
Eric Maskin discusses Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), stating it would lead to more extremists but also more centrists like Bloomberg who would ultimately win. He also notes evidence suggests RCV increases voter turnout.
Eric Maskin discusses Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV), stating it would lead to more extremists but also more centrists like Bloomberg who would ultimately win. He also notes evidence suggests RCV increases voter turnout.
Larry Summers follows up with Eric Maskin after a morning meeting, discussing the political analysis of a proposal, possibly related to voting systems. He analyzes potential impacts on elections, referencing Nader, Bush, and Gore, and mentions that he gave 'them' (presumably the group behind the proposal) 10,000.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity