Assistant US Attorney (SDNY)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
FBI special agent
|
Professional investigative collaboration |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Scheduled phone call between Gloria Allred and Assistant US Attorney regarding the Epstein case. | Phone Call (6:00 PM EST) | View |
RE: Discovery Requests
Confirming provision of a drive for file loading, dependent on snow storm.
RE: Discovery Requests
Providing FTP link and listing missing Bates ranges (SDNY_GM_00167911 etc).
RE: Discovery Requests
Noting that Bates ranges were already produced twice; requesting a 64GB drive to reproduce them a third time as files are too large for FTP.
RE: Discovery Requests
Detailed response to 9 points raised by defense regarding discovery, including hard drives, metadata, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.
Discovery Requests
Initial lengthy email raising 9 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight log pages, unredacted FBI reports, and Daily Beast article concerns.
RE: Reference materials further to our call
SDNY rejects the offer of a written statement, stating it will not assist the investigation. SDNY informs Blackfords they will move forward with an MLA request to the UKCA for a 'compelled interview'.
Re: Reference materials further to our call
Bloxsome reiterates that the Duke will provide a witness statement and answer relevant written questions, including those outside the Maxwell indictment scope, but refuses an in-person/video interview.
Re: Reference materials further to our call
Bloxsome disputes SDNY's summary of their position. Offers a written witness statement regarding the Maxwell indictment (1994-1997) and written answers to relevant events even if outside that period.
RE: Reference materials further to our call
SDNY demands a yes/no answer on two points: 1) Will the client sit for a voluntary interview? 2) Will the client answer questions outside the 1994-1997 period? States that repeating the offer of written answers will be interpreted as a 'negative' to both.
RE: Reference materials further to our call
SDNY seeks to confirm their understanding that the client refuses a voluntary interview and refuses to answer questions outside the 1994-1997 period.
Re: Reference materials further to our call
Long email detailing the UK legal perspective. States the Duke is willing to provide a written witness statement on Maxwell/Epstein issues (1994-1997). Notes SDNY views the Duke as a 'subject' rather than a 'witness', justifying the refusal of an oral interview. Demands confidentiality assurance.
Reference materials further to our call
Sends legal extracts (UK FCA defaults, US v. Allen, Kastigar v. US) regarding protections against self-incrimination in compelled testimony/MLA requests.
FW: Epstein search warrant documents
Requesting a spreadsheet for electronic devices seized from NY residence similar to the USVI one.
RE: Call this week
Providing desk number for the call.
Re: Call this week
Confirming call at 2:30/4:30 today and asking for best number.
Re: Call this week
Suggesting Thursday afternoon after 2 pm MST.
Re: Call this week
Proposing 2:30 pm MST / 4:30 pm EST on Thursday.
Call this week
Requesting a call to touch base regarding the Epstein case.
RE: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19-CRIM-00490 (S.D....
Confirming point of contact for Touhy requests related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity