| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Glassman
|
Adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Settlement negotiation | A series of settlement negotiations involving Jane's claim, including an offer from the EVCP and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Negotiation | Glassman negotiated with the EVCP, demanding a higher settlement. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-30 | N/A | Execution of General Release | Unknown | View |
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
This document is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued to Jordana Feldman of the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program (EVCP). The defense (Maxwell's legal team) is demanding the production of all claim forms, communications, payment records, and releases related to four specific (redacted) accusers who submitted claims to the EVCP. The deadline for production was set for November 29, 2021.
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
This document is a subpoena issued by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20CR330) to an undisclosed recipient (likely an administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program). The subpoena demands the production of materials submitted by accusers to the EVCP, including claim forms, communications, payment records, and releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Protocol' (dated May 29, 2020), which details the rules, eligibility requirements, and procedures for victims seeking compensation from the Epstein Estate, noting that the program is voluntary, independent, and confidential.
This document is a subpoena issued by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in November 2021, commanding the production of records from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The subpoena seeks all materials submitted by accusers, communications between the EVCP and accusers, records of payments, and executed releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Protocol' for the EVCP dated May 29, 2020, which outlines the independent program's purpose, eligibility requirements, claims administration process, and confidentiality rules for compensating victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an excerpt from a legal General Release agreement, likely related to a settlement or compensation claim. It details the 'Releasor's' waiver of rights, authorization for information disclosure to 'Epiq' for resolving liens (Medicare/Medicaid), and the 'Epstein Estate's' responsibility to pay negotiated amounts for resolved claims. The Releasor is granting this release voluntarily in exchange for a Compensation Offer and has received legal advice.
This legal document presents an argument to the Court to preclude the testimony of Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman. The core argument is that Glassman's settlement negotiations with an entity called EVCP cannot be used to impeach a witness named Jane, because she testified she was unaware of these negotiations. Allowing this testimony would be improper impeachment and more prejudicial than probative.
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, discusses the defendant's attempt to introduce statements from Robert Glassman to impeach a witness named Jane. The document details Jane's evolving testimony about a trip to New York with Epstein and the defendant to see 'The Lion King,' noting that her corrected recollections were communicated to the Government by her lawyer. The prosecution argues that Glassman's testimony on these same points is unnecessary and that questions about Jane's conversations with him were met with sustained objections.
This document is a legal filing (page 5 of 9) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated December 15, 2021. It argues against the defense's attempt to call attorney Scarola to the stand to testify about his client Carolyn's cooperation with the government and the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP), citing attorney-client privilege and Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (prejudice/confusion). The text asserts that Carolyn was unaware of when the EVCP began accepting claims when she decided to cooperate, negating the defense's theory of financial bias.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that certain communications related to a claimant named 'Jane' are not protected by attorney-client privilege. The argument is based on her representative, Mr. Glassman, sharing her statements and settlement demands with third parties, including the government, the EVCP, and Ms. Maxwell's counsel. The document details specific financial demands, such as a $25 million demand and a $5 million offer, to demonstrate that these communications were not confidential.
This document is a General Release form dated November 30, 2020, for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). A redacted claimant accepts a settlement offer of $5,000,000.00 in exchange for releasing the Epstein Estate, The 1953 Trust, and associated entities from all liability regarding claims of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The document serves as a legal waiver of future claims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity