Gagnon
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00009152.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing by the U.S. Government, likely a motion or memorandum. It cites various legal precedents to establish the standards for conducting a post-verdict inquiry into potential juror misconduct. The Government argues that these standards have been met with respect to 'Juror 50' due to an inconsistency between his public statements about being a victim of sexual abuse and his answer on a juror questionnaire, and therefore consents to a hearing to determine if the juror lied.
DOJ-OGR-00009833.jpg
This legal document argues that a hearing to question Juror 50 should be strictly limited in scope and conducted by the Court itself. The author contends the inquiry should only focus on whether the juror intentionally lied in response to specific voir dire questions and was actually biased, citing legal precedent and Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) to prevent improper questioning about jury deliberations. This approach is recommended to avoid harassment of the juror regarding sensitive topics like sexual abuse and to prevent the defendant from introducing inadmissible subjects.
DOJ-OGR-00005893.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Exhibit 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. It contains an excerpt from the 'Journal of Interpersonal Violence' discussing the historical definitions and psychological theories surrounding 'seduction,' 'grooming,' and 'rape' in the context of child sexual abuse. The text cites various psychoanalytic and psychological authors from the mid-20th century to contrast older definitions of seduction with the modern understanding of grooming as a method to facilitate sexual offenses.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity