| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional advisory |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
sender
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
This document contains a heated email chain involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) and likely Leon Black ('Leon'). Epstein demands an annual fee of $40 million for his services, citing past financial benefits of $1.5-2 billion he secured for Leon, while heavily criticizing the 'incompetence' of Leon's family office staff (Joslin, Brad). The chain includes a forwarded email from attorney Alan Halperin regarding an IRS response and a valuation discount from Empire Valuation, as well as a note about a GIV aircraft being 'completed'.
This document contains a series of emails from November 2015 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), Melanie Spinella, and advisors. The correspondence details complex financial maneuvers, including high-interest loans ($50k/day interest), the creation of trusts ('apo1'), and asset transfers involving 'Leon' (likely Leon Black). It also includes agendas discussing 'legacy' items such as art distribution upon death, 'Gagosian' deals, and a cryptic reference to 'inspire - FBI'.
This document contains an email chain involving Jeffrey Epstein and associates of Leon Black (addressed as 'Leon'). The text includes a 2016 email from Alan Halperin to Epstein regarding a valuation discount, and a lengthy, contentious 2015 email from Epstein to Leon (via Melanie Spinella). In the 2015 email, Epstein characterizes Leon's family wealth as a '$6 billion dollar corp' with massive income but insufficient overhead/oversight, defends his 'high fees' by claiming to have generated billions in benefits, and aggressively criticizes Leon's office staff and financial management decisions.
An email thread from April-May 2016 where Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.') aggressively negotiates his consulting fees with 'Leon' (likely Leon Black). Epstein demands $40 million per year, citing his past success in saving the client billions and managing estate/tax planning, while criticizing the incompetence of the client's family office staff (Joslin, Brad). The thread includes an underlying email from attorney Alan Halperin regarding an IRS valuation discount.
This document contains a chain of emails from November 2015 involving Jeffrey Epstein, Melanie Spinella, and an unidentified advisor (likely legal or financial). The emails discuss significant financial matters, including a suspicious $100 million overseas transfer involving Gagosian without a contract, high-interest loans costing $50k/day, estate planning, and trust management with Bank of America. The sender also expresses strong opinions on staffing (suggesting Ada Clapp should be fired) and mentions FBI involvement in a list of agenda items.
This document contains a Bloomberg article excerpt by Matt Levine discussing the finances and estate of 'Simmons' (likely Harold Simmons), featuring a graph comparing Valhi Inc stock to the S&P 500 from 2013-2014. The text discusses estate taxes, share calculations, and Simmons's political views and legal history with NL Industries. The document concludes with the signature block of Alan S. Halperin, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email from Alan Halperin to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) dated July 2, 2014. Halperin forwards an article by Matt Levine about the estate of billionaire Harold Simmons, specifically focusing on strategies to lower estate taxes by using the 'alternate valuation date.' Halperin asks Epstein, 'Was this your idea?' suggesting Epstein may have devised or advocated for similar aggressive tax avoidance strategies.
Attaching a draft response from Empire Valuation regarding a valuation discount on the low end.
Attaching draft response from Empire Valuation regarding valuation discount.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity